The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the numerical evaluation of Fredholm determinants
Open accessAbstract
Some significant quantities in mathematics and physics are most naturally expressed as the Fredholm determinant of an integral operator, most notably many of the distribution functions in random matrix theory. Though their numerical values are of interest, there is no systematic numerical treatment of Fredholm determinants to be found in the literature. Instead, the few numerical evaluations that are available rely on eigenfunction expansions of the operator, if expressible in terms of special functions, or on alternative, numerically more straightforwardly accessible analytic expressions, e.g., in terms of Painlevé transcendents, that have masterfully been derived in some cases. In this paper we close the gap in the literature by studying projection methods and, above all, a simple, easily implementable, general method for the numerical evaluation of Fredholm determinants that is derived from the classical Nyström method for the solution of Fredholm equations of the second kind. Using Gauss–Legendre or Clenshaw–Curtis as the underlying quadrature rule, we prove that the approximation error essentially behaves like the quadrature error for the sections of the kernel. In particular, we get exponential convergence for analytic kernels, which are typical in random matrix theory. The application of the method to the distribution functions of the Gaussian unitary ensemble (GUE), in the bulk scaling limit and the edge scaling limit, is discussed in detail. After extending the method to systems of integral operators, we evaluate the two-point correlation functions of the more recently studied Airy and Airy 1 \text {Airy}_1 processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms: Second Edition
Higham, N. J. (2002) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898718027 · Cited by 3,803
Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra
Meyer, C. (2000) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719512 · Cited by 3,565
Cited by
Distribution of the Ratio of Consecutive Level Spacings in Random Matrix Ensembles
Atas, Y. Y., Bogomolny, E., Giraud, O., & Roux, G. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.084101 · Cited by 983
THE KARDAR–PARISI–ZHANG EQUATION AND UNIVERSALITY CLASS
CORWIN, I. (2012) · Random Matrices: Theory and Applications · doi:10.1142/s2010326311300014 · Cited by 759
One-Dimensional Kardar-Parisi-Zhang Equation: An Exact Solution and its Universality
Sasamoto, T., & Spohn, H. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.230602 · Cited by 451
Growing interfaces uncover universal fluctuations behind scale invariance
Takeuchi, K. A., Sano, M., Sasamoto, T., & Spohn, H. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00034 · Cited by 301
The Limits of Query Monitoring against Distributed Model Extraction
Khilar, S. C. (2026) · arXiv
“D torus the measured lower outlier matched the BBP prediction to four decimals, and over 20,000 null worlds analytic Tracy–Widom thresholds (Tracy & Widom, 1994; Bornemann, 2010) matched false-alarm rates from 10 − 1 to 10 − 4 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bornemann, F.
- Venue
- Mathematics of Computation
- Publisher
- American Mathematical Society (AMS)
- Published
- 2009-09-24
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 270
- Pages
- 871-915
- ISSN
- 0025-5718 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2951868104
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the numerical evaluation of Fredholm determinants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1090/s0025-5718-09-02280-7
- The paper
- Bornemann, F. (2009). On the numerical evaluation of Fredholm determinants. Mathematics of Computation. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0025-5718-09-02280-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.