The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Elaborate Classification of SNARE Proteins Sheds Light on the Conservation of the Eukaryotic Endomembrane System
Open accessAbstract
Proteins of the SNARE (soluble N-ethylmalemide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) family are essential for the fusion of transport vesicles with an acceptor membrane. Despite considerable sequence divergence, their mechanism of action is conserved: heterologous sets assemble into membrane-bridging SNARE complexes, in effect driving membrane fusion. Within the cell, distinct functional SNARE units are involved in different trafficking steps. These functional units are conserved across species and probably reflect the conservation of the particular transport step. Here, we have systematically analyzed SNARE sequences from 145 different species and have established a highly accurate classification for all SNARE proteins. Principally, all SNAREs split into four basic types, reflecting their position in the four-helix bundle complex. Among these four basic types, we established 20 SNARE subclasses that probably represent the original repertoire of a eukaryotic cenancestor. This repertoire has been modulated independently in different lines of organisms. Our data are in line with the notion that the ur-eukaryotic cell was already equipped with the various compartments found in contemporary cells. Possibly, the development of these compartments is closely intertwined with episodes of duplication and divergence of a prototypic SNARE unit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 Å resolution
Sutton, R. B., Fasshauer, D., Jahn, R., & Brunger, A. T. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/26412 · Cited by 2,417 · cited 2×
“The structure of the central 0-layer is shown in detail on the top left (Sutton et al., 1998).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges
Embley, T. M., & Martin, W. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04546 · Cited by 867
Comparative Genomics, Evolution and Origins of the Nuclear Envelope and Nuclear Pore Complex
Mans, B., Anantharaman, V., Aravind, L., & Koonin, E. V. (2004) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.3.12.1316 · Cited by 304
Cited by
Membrane Fusion: Grappling with SNARE and SM Proteins
Südhof, T. C., & Rothman, J. E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1161748 · Cited by 2,027
A Comprehensive Comparison of Transmembrane Domains Reveals Organelle-Specific Properties
Sharpe, H. J., Stevens, T. J., & Munro, S. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.037 · Cited by 548
Helical extension of the neuronal SNARE complex into the membrane
Stein, A., Weber, G., Wahl, M. C., & Jahn, R. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08156 · Cited by 437
Secretory Protein Biogenesis and Traffic in the Early Secretory Pathway
Barlowe, C. K., & Miller, E. A. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.142810 · Cited by 330
Lőrincz, P., & Juhász, G. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.028 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Kloepper, T. H., Kienle, C. N., & Fasshauer, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3463-3471
- ISSN
- 1059-1524 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-4586
- OpenAlex
- W2165733650
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Elaborate Classification of SNARE Proteins Sheds Light on the Conservation of the Eukaryotic Endomembrane System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1091/mbc.e07-03-0193
- The paper
- Kloepper, T. H., Kienle, C. N., & Fasshauer, D. (2007). An Elaborate Classification of SNARE Proteins Sheds Light on the Conservation of the Eukaryotic Endomembrane System. Molecular Biology of the Cell. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e07-03-0193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.