Cited by 27Cellular transport and secretionCellular Mechanics and InteractionsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

Actin assembly produces sufficient forces for endocytosis in yeast

Open access
Nickaeen, Masoud, Berro, Julien, Pollard, Thomas D., Slepchenko, Boris M.·2019·Molecular Biology of the Cell

Abstract

We formulated a spatially resolved model to estimate forces exerted by a polymerizing actin meshwork on an invagination of the plasma membrane during endocytosis in yeast cells. The model, which approximates the actin meshwork as a visco-active gel exerting forces on a rigid spherocylinder representing the endocytic invagination, is tightly constrained by experimental data. Simulations of the model produce forces that can overcome resistance of turgor pressure in yeast cells. Strong forces emerge due to the high density of polymerized actin in the vicinity of the invagination and because of entanglement of the meshwork due to its dendritic structure and cross-linking. The model predicts forces orthogonal to the invagination that are consistent with formation of a flask shape, which would diminish the net force due to turgor pressure. Simulations of the model with either two rings of nucleation-promoting factors (NPFs) as in fission yeast or a single ring of NPFs as in budding yeast produce enough force to elongate the invagination against the turgor pressure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1091/mbc.e19-01-0059

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In yeast, active force generation by actin polymerization has been long established as the mechanism by which actin supports endocytosis.

    “In yeast, active force generation by actin polymerization has been long established as the mechanism by which actin supports endocytosis85,86.”

    From Membrane compression by synaptic vesicle exocytosis triggers ultrafast endocytosis (2023) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Introduction says actin assembly is necessary for membrane invagination in yeast and that polymerizing actin was believed to produce the required forces. The Discussion says it had remained unclear whether actin assembly generated enough force to overcome turgor pressure. Thus the force-generating mechanism is supported, but describing it as long established overstates how settled the paper says it was. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Aghamohammadzadeh S Ayscough KR (2009). Differential requirements for actin during yeast and mammalian endocytosis. Nat Cell Biol, 1039– 1042. 19597484 PMC2875176
  2. Arasada R Pollard TD (2011). Distinct roles for F-BAR proteins Cdc15p and Bzz1p in actin polymerization at sites of endocytosis in fission yeast. Curr Biol, 1450– 1459 21885283 PMC3350781
  3. Arasada R Sayyad WA Berro J Pollard TD (2018). High-speed superresolution imaging of the proteins in fission yeast clathrin-mediated endocytic actin patches. Mol Biol Cell, 295– 303. 29212877 PMC5996959
  4. Basu R Munteanu EL Chang F (2014). Role of turgor pressure in endocytosis in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell, 679– 687. 24403609 PMC3937093
  5. Berro J Pollard TD (2014). Synergies between Aip1p and capping protein subunits (Acp1p and Acp2p) in clathrin-mediated endocytosis and cell polarization in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell, 3515– 3527. 25143407 PMC4230613
  6. Berro J Sirotkin V Pollard TD (2010). Mathematical modeling of endocytic actin patch kinetics in fission yeast: disassembly requires release of actin filament fragments. Mol Biol Cell, 2905– 2915. 20587776 PMC2921120
  7. Buxbaum RE Dennerll T Weiss S Heidemann SR (1987). F-actin and microtubule suspensions as indeterminate fluids. Science, 1511– 1514. 2881354
  8. Carlsson AE (2018). Membrane bending by actin polymerization. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1– 7. PMC5911415 29207306
  9. Carlsson AE Bayly PV (2014). Force generation by endocytic actin patches in budding yeast. Biophys J, 1596– 1606. 24739159 PMC4008824
  10. Chen Q Pollard TD (2013). Actin filament severing by cofilin dismantles actin patches and produces mother filaments for new patches. Curr Biol, 1154– 1162. 23727096 PMC4131202
  11. Doi M Edwards S (1998). The Theory of Polymer Dynamics, New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Footer MJ Kerssemakers JWJ Theriot JA Dogterom M (2007). Direct measurement of force generation by actin filament polymerization using an optical trap. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2181– 2186. 17277076 PMC1892916
  13. Gardel ML Valentine MT Crocker JC Bausch AR Weitz DA (2003). Microrheology of entangled F-actin solutions. Phys Rev Lett, 158302. 14611506
  14. Jin AJ Prasad K Smith PD Lafer EM Nossal R (2006). Measuring the elasticity of clathrin-coated vesicles via atomic force microscopy. Biophys J, 3333– 3344. 16473913 PMC1432129
  15. Kaksonen M Roux A (2018). Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 313– 326. 29410531
  16. Kasza KE Broedersz CP Koenderink GH Lin YC Messner W Millman EA Nakamura F Stossel TP MacKintosh FC Weitz DA (2010). Actin filament length tunes elasticity of flexibly cross-linked actin networks. Biophys J, 1091– 1100. 20712992 PMC2920742
  17. Kruse K Joanny J-F Jülicher F Prost J Sekimoto K (2005). Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics. Eur Phys J E: Soft Matter, 5– 16. 15688136
  18. Kukulski W Schorb M Kaksonen M Briggs JA (2012). Plasma membrane reshaping during endocytosis is revealed by time-resolved electron tomography. Cell, 508– 520. 22863005
  19. Lacy MM Ma R Ravindra NG Berro J (2018). Molecular mechanisms of force production in clathrin- mediated endocytosis. FEBS Lett, 3586– 3605. 30006986 PMC6231980
  20. Landau LD Lifshitz EM (1987). Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 6, Course of Theoretical Physics, New York: Pergamon Press.
  21. MacKintosh FC Käs J Janmey PA (1995). Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. Phys Rev Lett, 4425. 10059905
  22. McFadden WM McCall PM Gardel ML Munro EM (2017). Filament turnover tunes both force generation and dissipation to control long-range flows in a model actomyosin cortex. PLoS Comp Biol, e1005811. PMC5757993 29253848
  23. Mullins RD Kelleher JF Xu J Pollard TD (1998). Arp2/3 complex from Acanthamoeba binds profilin and cross-links actin filaments. Mol Biol Cell, 841– 852. 9529382 PMC25311
  24. Mund M van der Beek JA Deschamps J Dmitrieff S Hoess P Monster J-L Picco A Nédélec F Kaksonen M Ries J (2018). Systematic nanoscale analysis of endocytosis links efficient vesicle formation to patterned actin nucleation. Cell, 884– 896. 30057119 PMC6086932
  25. Nickaeen M Novak IL Pulford S Rumack A Brandon J Slepchenko BM Mogilner A (2017). A free-boundary model of a motile cell explains turning behavior. PLoS Comp Biol, e1005862. PMC5705165 29136638
  26. Novak IL Gao F Kraikivski P Slepchenko BM (2011). Diffusion amid random overlapping obstacles: similarities, invariants, approximations. J Chem Phys, 154104. PMC3094463 21513372
  27. Novak IL Kraikivski P Slepchenko BM (2009). Diffusion in cytoplasm: effects of excluded volume due to internal membranes and cytoskeletal structures. Biophys J, 758– 767. 19651034 PMC2718152
  28. Peskin CS Odell GM Oster GF (1993). Cellular motions and thermal fluctuations: the Brownian ratchet. Biophys J, 316– 324. 8369439 PMC1225726
  29. Picco A Mund M Ries J Nédélec F Kaksonen M (2015). Visualizing the functional architecture of the endocytic machinery. eLife, e04535. PMC4357291 25675087
  30. Satcher RL Jr Dewey CF Jr (1996). Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. Biophys J, 109– 118. 8804594 PMC1233462
  31. Sato M Schwarz WH Pollard TD (1987). Dependence of the mechanical properties of actin/α-actinin gels on deformation rate. Nature, 828– 830. 3821871
  32. Scher-Zagier JK Carlsson AE (2016). Local turgor pressure reduction via channel clustering. Biophys J, 2747– 2756. 28002750 PMC5192740
  33. Schmit JD Kamber E Kondev J (2009). Lattice model of diffusion-limited bimolecular chemical reactions in confined environments. Phys Rev Lett, 218308. 19519142
  34. Sirotkin V Berro J Macmillan K Zhao L Pollard TD (2010). Quantitative analysis of the mechanism of endocytic actin patch assembly and disassembly in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell, 2894– 2904. 20587778 PMC2921122
  35. Sun Y Leong NT Jiang T Tangara A Darzacq X Drubin DG (2017). Switch-like Arp2/3 activation upon WASP and WIP recruitment to an apparent threshold level by multivalent linker proteins in vivo. eLife, e29140. 28813247 PMC5559269
  36. Tseng Y Wirtz D (2004). Dendritic branching and homogenization of actin networks mediated by Arp2/3 complex. Phys Rev Lett, 258104. 15697951
  37. Wachsstock DH Schwarz WH Pollard TD (1994). Cross-linker dynamics determine the mechanical properties of actin gels. Biophys J, 801– 809. 8011912 PMC1275778
  38. Wirtz D (2009). Particle-tracking microrheology of living cells: principles and applications. Annu Rev Biophys, 301– 326. 19416071
  39. Zaner KS Stossel TP (1983). Physical basis of the rheologic properties of F-actin. J Biol Chem, 11004– 11009. 6885809

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nickaeen, M., Berro, J., Pollard, T. D., & Slepchenko, B. M.
Affiliations
  • UConn Health (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Slepchenko, Boris M.
Venue
Molecular Biology of the Cell
Published
2019-07-22
Volume
30
Issue
16
Pages
2014-2024
ISSN
  • 1059-1524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-4586
OpenAlex
W2955379069
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Molecular Biology of the Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Connecticut
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM026338, R01GM115636, P41GM103313)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
actin polymerization, endocytosis, yeast, membrane invagination, turgor pressure, viscoelastic gels, actin cross-linking, nucleation-promoting factors, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Actins, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cell Membrane, Computer Simulation, Endocytosis, Kinetics, Actin Cytoskeleton, Models, Biological, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Viscosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review