Analyzing Oppression
Abstract
This book presents a new, integrated theory of social oppression, which tackles the fundamental question that no theory of oppression has satisfactorily answered: if there is no natural hierarchy among humans, why are some cases of oppression so persistent? The book argues that the explanation lies in the coercive co-opting of the oppressed to join in their own oppression. This answer sets the stage for analysis throughout the book, as it explores the questions of how and why the oppressed join in their oppression. The book argues that oppression is an institutionally structured harm perpetrated on social groups by other groups using direct and indirect material, economic, and psychological force. Among the most important and insidious of the indirect forces is an economic force that operates through oppressed persons' own rational choices. This force constitutes the central feature of analysis, and the book argues that this force is especially insidious because it conceals the fact of oppression from the oppressed and from others who would be sympathetic to their plight. The oppressed come to believe that they suffer personal failings and this belief appears to absolve society from responsibility. While in the book's view oppression is grounded in material exploitation and physical deprivation, it cannot be long sustained without corresponding psychological forces. The book examines the direct and indirect psychological forces that generate and sustain oppression. It discusses strategies that groups have used to resist oppression and argues that all persons have a moral responsibility to resist in some way. The concluding chapter proposes a concept of freedom that would be possible for humans in a world that is actively opposing oppression, arguing that freedom for each individual is only possible when we achieve freedom for all others.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amadasun, S., & Omorogiuwa, T. B. E. (2020) · Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences · doi:10.1108/jhass-12-2019-0082 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cudd, A. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cudd, Ann E.
- ORCID
- Cudd, Ann E.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W4238869303
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- oppression, coercion, co-optation, economic exploitation, psychological forces, material deprivation, moral responsibility, resistance to oppression, freedom, institutional harm, social hierarchy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review