The DOI matches its Crossref record.
British Economic Growth 1856-1973
Abstract
The subject of this book is the course and causes of British economic growth from the middle of the nineteenth century until 1973. The approach is quantitative in that it is heavily statistical while being well grounded in economic theory. Special emphasis is placed on growth in the period since World War II in comparison with growth in earlier periods. The pattern of growth was U‐shaped: it declined from above 2% a year in the mid‐nineteenth century to zero during World War I and rose again to nearly 3% in the post‐World War II period. The superior performance of the post‐war period is accounted for by faster growth of total factor productivity (TFP), with total factor input growing more slowly despite a historically high rate of investment. The main exogenous factors contributing to the U‐shaped pattern of output and TFP growth are identified. The scope for catching up with technologically more advanced economies increased over time, and they themselves were innovating more rapidly in the post‐war period. Labour attitudes and managerial and entrepreneurial quality worsened in the latter part of the nineteenth century and improved in the twentieth century, partly because of the jolt to institutions administered by the World Wars. Foreign competition, especially in agriculture, and the exhaustion of TFP possibilities in textiles and coal mining also contributed to the decline in growth in the first half of the period. Throughout, and especially in the post‐war period, capital…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From 1856 to 1873, Britain's gross domestic product per man-hour grew at an annual rate of 1.3 percent, a rate which was not exceeded until the postwar boom of 1951-73 (Matthews et al., 1982, p. 22).”
From The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto (1998) · cites this paper as Matthews et al., 1982
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto
Boyer, G. R. (1998) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.12.4.151 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthews, R. C. O., Feinstein, C. H., & Odling-Smee, J.
- ORCID
- Matthews, R. C. O.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1982-10-28
- OpenAlex
- W1981935076
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 30.05
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Keywords
- British economic growth, total factor productivity, postwar economic growth, capital accumulation, investment, technological catch-up, innovation, managerial quality, entrepreneurial characteristics, import competition, agricultural competition, World War I, British economic history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: British Economic Growth 1856-1973. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0198284535.001.0001
- The paper
- Matthews, R. C. O., Feinstein, C. H., & Odling-Smee, J. (1982). British Economic Growth 1856-1973. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198284535.001.0001