The Problems of Communitarian Politics: Unity and Conflict
Abstract
Offers a detailed critical analysis of the ideal of ‘community’ in politics. Traces elements of the idea of community in a number of social, philosophical, and political contexts over the last century, exploring how these have been and continue to be articulated in recent political and public policy debates. ‘Community’ is invoked as a justification for reorganization of state institutions, as the source of care and support for individuals, and as an entity that is valuable in its own right and must therefore be sustained and defended. In community development, community action, community care and community politics, the tensions and contradictions within the concept are invariably felt. Community is both inclusive and exclusive, both organized and unstructured, both hierarchical and egalitarian. The book argues that analysis of the concept ‘community’ reveals the role of ideas and ideals in shaping political action, the barriers to the realization of community in practical contexts, and ultimately the untenability of the ideal itself.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Public boards choose between the politics of community and the market as the master design for pedagogical encounters; the former provides a cultural backdrop better suited for the practice of librarianship.
“At one level, public boards have a choice between ''the politics of community'' (Frazer 1999, iii) and ''the market . . .as the master design for all pedagogical encounters'' (Giroux 2004, 103).The former concept, with its emphasis on the communal, provides a cultural backdrop better suited than the latter in terms of an environment for the practice of librarianship”
From The Value of a Communitarian Approach to Public Library Board Governance: Rejecting Current Neoliberal Practice / La valeur d’une approche communautariste de la gouvernance du conseil d’administration d’une bibliothèque publique : Le rejet de la pratique néolibérale actuelle (2012) · cites this paper as Frazer 1999
Cites
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A realistic conception of politics: conflict, order and political realism
Burelli, C. (2021) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2019.1604045 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Irwin, B. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science · doi:10.1353/ils.2012.0002 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Frazer, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Frazer, Elizabeth
- ORCID
- Frazer, Elizabeth
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1999-11-04
- OpenAlex
- W2485698749
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Keywords
- communitarianism, community, political community, community development, community action, community-based care, community politics, public policy, state restructuring, inclusivity and exclusivity, political ideals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review