The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis
Abstract
The main goal of this chapter is to use an extensive body of comparative survey research to map patterns and forms of political support across a wide range of political conditions. While the goal is primarily descriptive, at least two themes emerge: first, there are no major trends suggesting a decline in support for democracy as a form of government in the abstract or as applied to existing democratic experience, and certainly, no evidence of a crisis of democracy; second, the fact of dissatisfaction does not imply danger to the persistence or furtherance of democracy. A significant number of people around the world can be labelled ‘dissatisfied democrats’, they clearly approve of democracy as a mode of governance, but they remain discontented with the way their own system is currently operating. This chapter exploits the resources of the World Values Surveys to map certain key elements of political support among the mass publics in established, consolidating, and non‐democracies. Specifically, it develops indices fitted reasonably well to three forms of support: for the political community; for regime principles or democracy as an ideal form of government; and approval of the regime's performance. Attitudes towards these three dimensions are examined through cross‐national surveys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf02249397 · Cited by 2,392
Linz, J. J. (. J. (1990) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2005.0026 · Cited by 1,737
POWELL, G. B. (1982) · doi:10.4159/9780674042353 · Cited by 874
A Culturalist Theory of Political Change
Eckstein, H. (1988) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1962491 · Cited by 392
Hardin, R. (1996) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/233695 · Cited by 331
Coleman Revisited: Religious Structures as a Source of Social Capital
GREELEY, A. (1997) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764297040005005 · Cited by 223
Cited by
Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017 · Cited by 1,795
Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies
Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00007 · Cited by 1,307
Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy
Canache, D., Mondak, J. J., & Seligson, M. A. (2001) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/323576 · Cited by 527
Learning about Democracy in Africa: Awareness, Performance, and Experience
Mattes, R., & Bratton, M. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00245.x · Cited by 432
Political Trust, Satisfaction and Voter Turnout
Grönlund, K., & Setälä, M. (2007) · Comparative European Politics · doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110113 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Klingemann, H.
- Venue
- Critical Citizens
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1999-03-25
- Pages
- 31-56
- OpenAlex
- W1576678603
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 161.63
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0198295685.003.0002
- The paper
- Klingemann, H. (1999). Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. Critical Citizens. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295685.003.0002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.