The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two Concepts of Liberty
Abstract
This lecture insisted upon negative liberty as the political complement to the human capacity for free choice, and made matching metaphysical claims: the nature of being, and especially the conflicts amongst values, were inconsistent with totalitarian claims. Berlin, arguing along this line, provided an account of the perversion of positive liberty into a warrant for such claims, discussed nationalism, and emphasized the value‐pluralism, now linked so frequently with his name.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An economic theory of self-control.
Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260971 · Cited by 2,203
Berg, J. M., Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.645 · Cited by 890
Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well-Being?
Markus, H. R., & Schwartz, B. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651242 · Cited by 381
The jury and abjury of my peers: The self in face and dignity cultures.
Kim, Y.-H., Cohen, D., & Au, W.-T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017936 · Cited by 206
Freedom and Privacy in Ambient Intelligence
Brey, P. (2005) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-0005-3 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Berlin, I.
- Venue
- Liberty
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2002-03-07
- Pages
- 166-217
- OpenAlex
- W568582219
- Cited by
- 1,948
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 377.15
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Concepts of Liberty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/019924989x.003.0004
- The paper
- Berlin, I. (2002). Two Concepts of Liberty. Liberty. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924989x.003.0004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
