Cited by 71Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology ResearchDiabetes Management and Education

Association Between Purpose in Life and Glucose Control Among Older Adults

Open access
Hafez, Dina, Heisler, Michele, Choi, HwaJung, Ankuda, Claire K, Winkelman, Tyler, Kullgren, Jeffrey T·2018·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Greater purpose in life is associated with lower rates of certain chronic diseases. Whether purpose in life can protect against development of prediabetes or type 2 diabetes is unknown. Purpose: To examine the association between purpose in life and blood glucose control among adults ≥50 years. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of 3,907 participants of the Health and Retirement Study who at baseline did not have type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Baseline purpose in life was measured using the Ryff and Keyes' Scales of Psychological Well-Being and grouped into tertiles (high, medium, and low). We used multivariable linear regression to examine the association between baseline purpose in life and HbA1c over 4 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between baseline purpose and incident prediabetes or type 2 diabetes over the same period. Results: After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, body mass index, physical activity, and physical and mental health factors, HbA1c was 0.07 percentage points lower among participants with high purpose than those with low purpose (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.12 to -0.02; p = .011). Participants with high purpose had lower odds of developing prediabetes or type 2 diabetes than those with low purpose (adjusted odds ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.98; p = .037). Conclusions: Among older adults, greater purpose in life is associated with a lower incidence of prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. Strategies to promote greater purpose in life should be tested as a part of type 2 diabetes prevention efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/abm/kax012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults with a greater sense of purpose have more favorable lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors such as less smoking, more physical activity, less alcohol and substance abuse, and better glucose control.

    “Similar to optimistic adults, adults with a greater sense of purpose have more favorable lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors such as less smoking, 70 more physical activity, 30 less alcohol and substance abuse, and better glucose control. 71”

    From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Results and Discussion (pages unavailable in our copy) support the claim of better glucose control: among older adults with normal baseline glucose, higher purpose was associated with lower HbA1c and lower incidence of prediabetes or type 2 diabetes at four years. Citation 71 follows both the alcohol/substance-abuse and glucose-control clauses, but our copy does not support the alcohol or substance-abuse claim. The smoking and physical-activity clauses have separate citations in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 71

Authors
Hafez, D., Heisler, M., Choi, H., Ankuda, C. K., Winkelman, T., & Kullgren, J. T.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Hafez, Dina
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2018-02-10
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
309-318
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2792220276
Cited by
71
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (NIA U01AG009740)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
meaning of life, glycemic control, HbA1c, prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, older adults, psychological well-being, diabetes prevention, Health and Retirement Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Health Surveys, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Prediabetic State, United States, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review