The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fractionation of the Supervisory System
Abstract
Foreword ; Preface ; 1. Introduction ; 2. The Human Frontal Lobes: Transcending the Default Mode through Contigent Encoding ; 3. Association Pathways of the Prefrontal Cortex and Functional Observations ; 4. Neurochemical Modulation of Prefrontal Cortical Functions in Humans and Animals ; 5. Functional Architecture of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Monkeys and Man ; 6. Physiology of Executive Functions: The Perception-Action Cycle ; 7. The Theatre of the Mind: Physiological Studies of the Human Frontal Lobes ; 8. Motor Programming for Hand and Vocalizing Movements ; 9. Cortical Control of Visuometer Reflexes ; 10. Disorders of Language After Frontal Lobe Injury ; 11. The Organization of Working Memory Function in Lateral Prefrontal Cortex ; 12. The Frontal Cortex and Working with Memory ; 13. Memory Retrieval and Executive Control Processes ; 14. Dorsal Prefrontal Cortex: Maintenance in Memory or Attentional Selection ; 15. Mechanisms of Conflict Resolution in Prefrontal Cortex ; 16. Fractionating the Central Executive ; 17. Fractionation of the Supervisory System ; 18. Cognitive Focus through Adaptive Neural Coding in Primate Prefrontal Cortex ; 19. The Structured Event Complex and the Human Prefrontal Cortex ; 20. Chronesthesia: Conscious Awareness of Subjective Time ; 21. Integration Across Multiple Cognitive and Motivational Domains in Monkey Prefrontal Cortex ; 22. Emotion, Decision-Making and the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex ; 23. The Functions of the Orbitofro…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even the most complex model in this domain, that of Shallice (e.g., Norman & Shallice, 1986; Shallice, 1988, 2002; Shallice & Burgess, 1991a, 1991b, 1993, 1996; Shallice et al., 1989) still utilises the concept of attention, where the possibility of domain- or material-specificity is either denied or left as a lacuna.”
From The case for the development and use of ecologically valid measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology (2006) · cites this paper as Shallice, 2002
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Working memory: Looking back and looking forward
Baddeley, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1201 · Cited by 5,200
Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies
Baddeley, A. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422 · Cited by 4,271
Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework.
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31 · Cited by 2,695
The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding.
Jurado, M. B., & Rosselli, M. (2007) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-007-9040-z · Cited by 1,684
Snyder, H. R., Miyake, A., & Hankin, B. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00328 · Cited by 946
Metadata
- Authors
- Shallice, T.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Shallice, Tim
- Venue
- Principles of Frontal Lobe Function
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2002-08-08
- Pages
- 261-277
- OpenAlex
- W2488238324
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- SDL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- supervisory control system, distributed control, process control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
