The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coda: Early Music Printing as an Agent of Change
Abstract
In a recent study of Russian printing during the 18th century, Gary Marker argued that the traditional view of printing as an “instrument of progress” is insufficient, and that he needed to discuss a more basic series of questions. Of course, Russian society during and after the reign of Peter the Great was very different from that of Italy during the 16th century. There are ways, however, in which publishing in the first half of the 16th century does seem to show parallels. For music, the closeness of the parallels is enhanced by the presence of a specialized market, involving both particular reading skills and particular classes of purchasers. Taken together, these various elements make more relevant the question of whether music printing “merely” responded to developments in musical society, or whether it seriously influenced those developments. In this context, the questions posed by Marker need to be addressed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Boorman, S.
- Corresponding author
- Boorman, Stanley
- Venue
- Ottaviano Petrucci
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2005-11-17
- Pages
- 397-405
- OpenAlex
- W2496567377
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
- Keywords
- music publishing, 16th-century music, Italian music, music market, reading skills, music and society, Peter the Great
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coda: Early Music Printing as an Agent of Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195142075.003.0013
- The paper
- Boorman, S. (2005). Coda: Early Music Printing as an Agent of Change. Ottaviano Petrucci. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780195142075.003.0013