The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 30 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
In Search of the Black Fantastic
Abstract
Prior to the 1960s, when African Americans had little access to formal political power, black popular culture was commonly seen as a means of forging community and effecting political change. But as this book shows, despite the changes brought about by the civil rights movement, and contrary to the wishes of those committed to narrower conceptions of politics, black artists have continued to play a significant role in the making and maintenance of critical social spaces. The book offers a portrait of the relationship between popular culture and institutionalized politics, tracing the connections between artists such as Paul Robeson, Lorraine Hansberry, Richard Pryor, Bob Marley and Erykah Badu and those individuals working in the protest, electoral, and policy making arenas. With an emphasis on questions of class, gender, sexuality, diaspora and coloniality, the book also illustrates how creative artists destabilize modern notions of the proper location of politics, and politics itself.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Richard Iton argues that black popular culture has been and remains a central arena of black politics in the post-civil rights era, even as formal black electoral representation increased. He proposes the “black fantastic” as a minor-key sensibility generated from underground, vagabond, and deviant experiences that can unsettle modernity, the state, and the aesthetic/politics divide.
Key findings
- For blacks in the United States and elsewhere, the outside/inside dynamic has often been experienced asymmetrically: political disfranchisement alongside overemployment in popular culture. Cultural symbols and negotiations of black interests remained a major component of black politics despite the 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1965 Voting Rights Act.
- Although legal victories were expected to routinize black politics into formal arenas, informal, protest, extrastate, religious, and popular-cultural politics continued to be politically relevant. The text notes that 43 of the 535 members of Congress are black, yet argues that formal politics still operates under serious constraints.
- Anxieties about black exceptionalism and respectability can encourage avoidance of struggle and abandonment of transformative possibilities. Hyperactivity in the cultural realm is usually a response to marginalization from decision-making, not a freely chosen difference.
- Popular culture can mobilize or demobilize and sustain progressive or reactionary narratives; it offers accessible deliberative space and recognition, but artists’ actions rarely bring about specific substantive policy reorientations and more often have diffuse, symbolic impact.
Methods
- Theoretical and interpretive essay in political science and cultural studies, synthesizing historical examples, cultural criticism, and secondary scholarship rather than collecting original data.
- Draws on post-civil rights era US black politics, with examples from film, music, literature, media, and organizations; it outlines the book’s chapters from the Cold War and Black Arts Movement to welfare reform, diaspora, and gender/sexuality.
- No formal sample, dataset, or statistical analysis; the analysis is conceptual and normative.
Limitations
- Stated: the author intends to be “suggestive rather than comprehensive,” given the range of topics and artistic media under consideration.
- Evident: no systematic empirical testing or causal identification; claims rely on interpretive readings and secondary sources.
- Evident: the scope is broad and US/diaspora-focused, with limited sustained treatment of any single case in this chapter.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
106 Own interpretation · 25 Sources not found · 1 No basis given
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the negotiation, representation, and reimagination of black interests through cultural symbols has continued to be a major component in the making of black politics.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a consequence, actors involved in protest and electoral activity made frequent efforts to shape the contributions (or, if necessary, silence the voices) of individuals working in the various cultural arenas.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The ambition to be included in mainstream spaces can necessitate accepting alienation and subordination as the price of the ticket (to use James Baldwin's term).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites James Baldwin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For African Americans, partly because of their marginal status and often violent exclusion from the realms of formal politics, popular culture was an integral and important aspect of the making of politics throughout the pre-civil rights era and the civil rights era itself-'a time when it was almost impossible,' g7Flm historian Donald Bogle contends, 'to keep politics and aesthetics apart.'”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Donald Bogle
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Just as the mythology of racial democracy in the Brazilian instance obscures as much as it reveals, the simple equation of the racial and ideological dynamics of the blues perspective and the jazz world with the operations of American democracy-a rhetorical stance frequently endorsed by Albert Murray, Stanley Crouch, and Wynton Marsalis-cannot be supported empirically.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Albert Murray
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Stanley Crouch
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Wynton Marsalis
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is specig7Fcally because of this disjunction between the political and cultural realms that one of the arguments Ellison and his intellectual progeny raise is so unconvincing: the obvious in uence of African Americans on mainstream American culture (i.e., the blues and jazz) and the possibility that all Americans are cultural mulattoes do not translate into acceptance of blacks in the formal”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The engagement with and interpellation via cultural representations of black life by (white) American citizens historically has been quite compatible with the marginalization and disfranchisement of African Americans as political subjects and potential members of the republican community.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural politics, albeit in a modig7Fed form, would also continue to represent a signig7Fcant aspect of black expression, despite optimism regarding the progressive possibilities of working within the 'rules of the game.'”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“While there is some validity to this point-the suggestion that the meaning of terms can oat-one has to question the probability that the term 'modernity' can be divested of its progressive assumptions and hierarchical designs.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Walter Ong
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this context, the cultural products that mainstream outlets created and propagated-such as the minstrel shows of the nineteenth century, g7Flms including The Birth of a Nation , Al Jolson's Jazz Singer , and Gone with the Wind , and the radio version of Amos 'n' Andy -often provoked criticism and outrage on the part of blacks who interpreted the promotion of images they saw as unfavorable, as a”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 81
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The major focus of debate in the 2002 primary contests in Alabama's Seventh District between incumbent Democrat Earl Hilliard and eventual victor Artur Davis, and in Georgia's Fourth District between incumbent Cynthia McKinney and eventual victor Denise Majette, was the Palestinian/Israeli conflict (although there were other issues in both races).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the two congressional races and the 2002 mayoral contest in Newark, funds for the challengers also apparently came from organizations such as the right-wing Bradley Foundation, which sought to generate appearances of conflict among black voters and specifically youth and middle-class dissatisfaction with existing black elected representatives.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Glen Ford, 'Hip Hop and the Hard Right: Media-Made Illusions of Power,' ColorLines 5, no. 4 (winter 2003), pp. 4-7
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For blacks in the United States and elsewhere, this outside/inside dynamic has often been experienced asymmetrically: as political disfranchisement on the one hand and overemployment in the arenas of popular culture on the other.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The outside is always inside: the marginalized are invisible, implicated, disempowered, unrecognized but omnipresent.
- Rests on an assumption: The identities of the dominant order are inevitably defined in opposition to, and as a negation of, the representations of the marginalized.
In the paper
“If modernity is more than just a at trope representing the 'new' (in other words, a benign temporal marker), if it is in fact 'premised,' as Wendy Brown contends, 'on the notion of emergence from darker times and places,' and accordingly continues to reconstitute peoples of African descent as subaltern others-even demanding such an arrangement-then endorsing the term would not seem to allow much”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wendy Brown
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Modern life begins with slavery.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The black Atlantic is necessarily a counterculture of modernity.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“blacks can rightly claim co-ownership as stockholders in the projects of modernity (and copyright holders with regard to the deg7Fnition of many of these endeavors)”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These dynamics have also demanded sensibilities that recognize that solidarities are always contingent and essentialisms at best pragmatic, positional, and strategic.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, the ways the performative challenges the truth claims of the formally political and casts it as itself just another mode of performance explain many of the disjunctions between the two realms, and the characteristic disavowal of any intimate connection with the cultural on the part of the political narrowly understood.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The inclination in formal politics toward the quantig7Fable and the bordered, the structured, ordered, policeable, and disciplined is in fundamental tension with popular culture's willingness to embrace disturbance, to engage the apparently mad and maddening, to sustain often slippery frameworks of intention that act subliminally, if not explicitly, on distinct and overlapping cognitive registers,”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intentional silences also have signig7Fcance: to say nothing suggests acceptance of, or satisfaction with, existing arrangements, and implicitly represents the expression of a political preference.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Opting out, then, is not a viable-or available-response.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, in the language game staked out by the modern, blacks are uniquely locked into a relationship that allows few possibilities for agency, autonomy, or substantive negotiation.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Modern life begins with slavery.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The black Atlantic is necessarily a counterculture of modernity.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These desires not to be excluded from the community of the 'normal,' often underwritten by a particular form of vindicationist spirit, can translate into an avoidance of struggle and the abandonment of transformative possibilities.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have come to realize that the exclusion and marginalization of the blacks in the United States illustrates a dynamic wherein this same group of people simultaneously experience the opposite - a dominant order and a privileged community as demonstrated by political deprivation and dominance in popular culture.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The outside is always inside: the marginalized are invisible, implicated, disempowered, unrecognized but omnipresent.
- Rests on an assumption: The identities of the dominant order are inevitably defined in opposition to, and as a negation of, the representations of the marginalized.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although many artists might claim that their work is not 'political'-'Nothing about politics,' asserted Luther Vandross, arguably the most gifted male vocalist of his generation, 'I don't write about politics'-that they are driven purely by aesthetic considerations, or that they seek to entertain and provide escape from 'reality' for their audiences, political intention adheres to every cultural”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a corresponding set of material institutions and practices that re ect the ambitions and horizons that the language envisions and demands: processes, mechanisms, and arenas that are viscerally addicted to ascriptive rankings, unavoidably colonial in their appetites, and immune to deep egalitarian reimagining and restructuring.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Not surprisingly, the civil rights/labor/liberal coalition collapsed by the end of the decade, and Rustin's cong7Fdence regarding the progressive capacity of American democracy proved to be largely misplaced.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bayard Rustin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“blackness is a constitutively modern albeit unstable formation (i.e., its commitments to possibilities in excess of and beyond modernity).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, popular culture's willingness not to know, its frequent preference for experience over explanation, and its deployment of omission as method and silence as meaning, as in the work of Ahmad Jamal, Miles Davis, and Shirley Horn, mark its expressions and manifestations as distinct from the ambitions of the formally political.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is these dynamics that have trifurcated black sensibilities-among various invented, static and stigmatized pasts; unevenly across the centers and margins of contemporary life; and, in response to the multiple crises that mark the modernity/slavery nexus, into the unscripted but attractive-by-default postmodern and beyond.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The aesthetic in blackface, otherwise unrecong7Fgured, would still leave in place the sanctity of the aesthetic and the aesthetic/ political boundary.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If we agree that politics is, among other things, a contest about what matters and ought to be subject to consideration and debate, we will recognize both the assertion of the aesthetic and the suggestion that art is a self-contained realm 'above' politics as political arguments of a particular normative type (similar to the corresponding claims that are made with regard to science).”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, it can be argued that the 'art for art's sake' position depends on an arguably false and impossible dichotomy.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Political communication is not divorced from the same kinds of considerations that determine our responses to artistic work: imagine Malcolm X, for instance, without his comic timing and his sense of humor.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The apparent absence of a thickly transformative dialectic within modernity's matrix (e.g., the Hegelian blueprint); its seeming inability to shake itself free of its embedded sexism and racism; its primal tendency to read issues that make race salient as pointing toward either the premodern or antimodern; and the ways it makes, excludes, and yet exploits and contains black bodies, raise doubts”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While all three might share a certain bluesaic quality, the operations of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights have rarely been as amenable to the interests of African Americans, nor as re ective of their aspirations in practice, as the thing Ellison calls jazz.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Love itself, the subversive gift, is an important public good, and loving is a signig7Fcant political act, particularly among those stigmatized and marked as unworthy of love and incapable of deep commitment.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“His argument, though, was predicated on a model of the routine that clearly overlooked-and, given his own strategic commitments at the time, deliberately chose to minimize-the limits of legal discourse, the racialized foundation and irrational character of American politics, and the extent to which protest politics, and informal politics in general, were hardly unique to black communities.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bayard Rustin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although performances need not be insincere or merely calculating, and are sometimes simply a matter of amplig7Fcation (making one's intentions and message as clear as possible), popular culture thrives on, and indeed demands, nuance, dadaesque ambiguity, and contrapuntality as it resists g7Fxedness in its moves between the grounded and the fantastic.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, the suggestion that aesthetics cannot be divorced from politics does not imply that we cannot make aesthetic judgments regarding creative and political work; the point is that aesthetic judgments should not be cong7Fned to the artistic realm and cannot be detached from political considerations.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The processes of exclusion that have deg7Fned the black experience of modernity have not allowed those of African descent to avoid the transg7Fguring and scarring aspects of the extended moment or complicity in its present conditions.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the most superg7Fcial level, this concern overlooks the reality that the realms of formal political activity and cultural expression are joined in a number of complicated and mundane ways, not just in the making of black politics but in the making of politics in general.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The outside is always inside: the marginalized are invisible, implicated, disempowered, unrecognized but omnipresent.
- Rests on an assumption: The identities of the dominant order are inevitably defined in opposition to, and as a negation of, the representations of the marginalized.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As often, these kinds of assertions are meant to refer to the artist's disengagement from the issues driving formal political activity, although songs about romance and novels about family life, for example, certainly are political in the broadest sense.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Although belatedly in some instances, inclusive movements of the sort Dawson describes have developed in response to cases of police brutality, reparations, racial prog7Fling, voting rights infractions, and other racerelated civil rights violations, and been accompanied by movements within black popular culture”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Michael Dawson
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the way much of turn-of-the-century black pop (ranging from rapper Jay-Z's 'Hard Knock Life [Ghetto Anthem]' to gospel vocalist Donnie McClurkin's 'We Fall Down') naturalized economic hardship and specig7Fcally black poverty”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“'[S]uch a public sphere did exist within the Black community as recently as the early 1970s,' observed Michael Dawson in the mid-1990s, 'if by that we mean a set of institutions, communication networks and practices which facilitate debate of causes and remedies to the current combination of political setbacks and economic devastation facing major segments of the Black community, and which facilit”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Michael Dawson
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The blurring of the clear lines that demarcated black spaces is one of the legacies of the civil rights movement.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“cultural media and the actors involved in these arenas have played an increasingly crucial role in deg7Fning the aggregate black agenda and determining which issues will move from the internal arenas to the broader national stage (and possibly the international stage) with the perceived support of most African Americans.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actors in the cultural arenas, then, like early twentieth-century soapbox orators, have often been the primary public generators of black conventional wisdoms, and the main protagonists in the evolving battles concerning the negotiation of the boundaries of black community, and the deg7Fnition of the aggregate black agenda.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To the extent that simple recognition is an important political goal for political actors, the different media of popular culture provide a means by which this need can be satisg7Fed.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In those instances where recognition itself is the intended end point of political activity, cultural politics often might sufg7Fce.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is perhaps in the contemporary production and consumption of black cultural politics that the displacement of relatively procedural questions of location and orientation becomes most obvious.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hamilton's analysis speaks to a sensibility that assumes that public discourse among blacks is problematic and, with its cong7Fdent deployment of collective pronouns, assumes that race itself is a legitimate marker of community lines.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is extremely rare-though not impossible-for actions undertaken by creative artists alone to bring about specig7Fc substantive public policy reorientations on the part of state authorities.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they-especially the members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC)-have consistently been the most likely to promote liberal and democratic alternatives, and the most reliable defenders of black interests in congressional debates.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“'Few blacks,' suggests Gerald Early, 'accepted the song on its face, insisting that it was a metaphorical theme song for black unity and…revolution.'”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gerald Early
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the messages emanating from the arenas of popular culture can generate action and inaction, and encourage reactionary as well as progressive mindsets.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural work, then, must be understood as a result of the interactions of the creative process and its embedded intentions; the potentially quite distinct and even contrasting-but equally creative -use made of them by others; and the feedback mechanisms and interpolative possibilities linking these various stages (in both senses of the word).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it has long been a common practice for black actors and movements to draw in varying degrees from both the integrationist and nationalist traditions, depending on the audience in question and the prevailing circumstances.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“political movements' and campaigns' effectiveness in achieving particular policy objectives is affected by the broader atmospheric and symbolic discourses taking place.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Operating in deterritorialized arenas-for example, radio, television, and the internet-that confound the older understandings of the distinction between integrated and segregated spaces, artists in the post-civil rights era have been major contributors to the recalibration of the black discursive agenda.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The silences and evasions, which have been at times encouraged by other blacks, have not been as audible or apparent in the formal political realms-nor for that matter in the original added content provided by what remains of the black press, black-oriented radio, or the newer black media-as they have been in the aggregated arenas of popular culture.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the absorption with questions of segregation and assimilation has not dissipated completely; it lies just below the surface of almost every issue that attracts the interest of colored America (and the rest of the country as well).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The concerns of certain black constituencies have not been responded to, and indeed been avoided, by black elected ofg7Fcials.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“pop culture's ability to render the invisible visible (in an Ellisonian sense perhaps) or the unheard audible-and possibly, to borrow from Ellison and Fred Moten, the invisible audible and the unheard visible-gives it a certain political legitimacy.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The song does feature a certain post-King sensibility, and in its reclaiming of the streets, its references to (mostly) northern cities, and its propulsive, assertive rhythm, one can detect some sense of the changes that were taking place at the time”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“he asserted, 'A Black public sphere does not exist in contemporary America,' although he would later modify this claim somewhat and refer to the black counterpublic as 'severely undermined' and being in a state of 'disintegration.'”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Michael Dawson
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in choosing to say something , black artists can seek both to in uence outcomes and to redeg7Fne the terms of debate, within and outside their immediate communities, and to bring attention toand perhaps confer legitimacy on-the spaces in which they operate”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the agenda-setters controlling these black-oriented media outlets have been on the whole reluctant to reproduce ung7Fltered the intracommunity negotiations and con icts taking place within African American popular culture.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“'Precisely because African Americans historically have had more control over their own culture than many other aspects of their world,' historian Waldo Martin Jr. adds, 'culture has always been a critical battleground in their freedom struggle.'”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Waldo Martin Jr.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the fusion of the realms of politics and popular culture in mainstream American life does at one level present a unique array of dilemmas, problems, and opportunities for blacks.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“representations of blackness are always surreal, given the inevitably irregular and provocative qualities of these efforts and the 'source material' itself in a broader context in which the nonblack is thoroughly normalized.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“not engaging the cultural realm, whether defensively or assertively, would be, to some degree, to concede defeat in an important-and relatively accessible-arena.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hyperactivity on the cultural front usually occurs as a response to some sort of marginalization from the processes of decision-making or exercising control over one's own circumstances; what might appear to be an overinvestment in the cultural realm is rarely a freely chosen strategy.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is currently a limited ability for blacks to discuss issues in arenas not accessible to others.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Black life has, in many respects, become intensely public, partly as a result of the dramas that unfolded in the early 1990s, featuring in quick and painful succession Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill, Rodney King, and O. J. Simpson, among others.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result of this paradigm shift, and the related reordering of the black counterpublic, the primacy and stridency of the integrationist/nationalist debate subsides, as other concerns related to class, gender, sexuality, generation, and blackness in the aggregate emerge and become predominant.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The integrationist/nationalist divide was previously the primary axis of African American discourse.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the aesthetic is understood as a science of beauty that forecloses substantive political engagement or challenge, it must be recognized as a key brick in the wall of modernity and one of the cornerstones of the racialized edig7Fce that has so effectively contained and restricted black life chances.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“generally popular culture is about the mobilization of broader and less coherent sentiments.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I do not see modernity as a finished product (certainly not in the way he depicts it in his discussion of Toussaint L'Ouverture) or, as he seems to suggest at points, as an uncomplicated blessing”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is important to note that Agamben cites Nazism and the Holocaust as crucial markers of modernity's 'hidden matrix' (Agamben, Homo Sacer , p. 166) while paying little attention to the broader phenomenon of colonialism.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Agamben, Homo Sacer , p. 166
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, I propose that exchange in the cultural arena has the potential not only to upset the nation -in at least two senses-but also to counter the masculinist norms that often structure both state-centered and diasporic politics.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that Ellison's writing and his normative commitments shi over time”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also worth considering is popular culture's ability to cross barriers and engender broader solidarities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and to suggest that greater attention to a fuller range of deliberative practices and spaces might compel a revision of our notions of the political.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Chapter 4, I suggest that the technological changes occurring in the 1980s-especially with regard to the visual arts-challenge intracommunity assumptions about the inheritability of black political traditions and indeed the sustainability of a coherent black politics.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I do not see modernity as a finished product (certainly not in the way he depicts it in his discussion of Toussaint L'Ouverture)”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Chapter 5 follows chronologically and thematically from the previous chapter and examines the ways shifts in black discourse, situated in popular culture, might have affected, and not just re ected, the way blacks responded to the welfare reform debates of the mid-1990s (i.e., regarding the reform/abolition of Aid to Families with Dependent Children [AFDC]).”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“'Race,' as we commonly understand it, is in this perspective fundamentally part and parcel of the conjoined projects of modernity and colonialism.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Barnor Hesse, 'Racialized Modernity: An Analytics of White Mythologies,' Ethnic and Racial Studies 30, no. 4 (2007), pp. 64363
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The apparent willingness of a number of black clergy (e.g., T. D. Jakes, Boston's Eugene Rivers) to consider supporting George W. Bush's 'faith-based initiative' and school voucher plans (e.g., New York's Floyd Flake and a number of Detroit's black clergy during a 2000 Michigan referendum on the issue) is consistent with this reading of the aggregate political inclinations of the black churches.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“public spheres, civil societies, popular culture, and modernity are not blank slates and are in fact in antagonism with prefixes such as 'black' and 'Afro,' a tension that needs to be acknowledged.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Thomas C. Holt, 'Afterword: Mapping the Black Public Sphere,' in Black Public Sphere Collective, The Black Public Sphere , pp. 325-28; and Michael Warner, 'Publics and Counterpublics,' Public Culture 14, no. 1 (winter 2002), pp. 4990.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in this chapter I discuss more explicitly the transgressibility of the modernity/coloniality matrix and, specig7Fcally, diaspora's capacity through cultural exchange to challenge modern narratives that obscure their colonial underpinnings.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The emergence of salsa music in the 1970s, as a reporter with Billboard recognized, 'helped give Latinos a sense of national identity and political unity [and specifically represented] a musical vehicle…[through which Puerto Ricans could make] a political statement to the world…[and] especially to the broad anglo community in the New York metropolitan area.'”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites David Medina, 'A View from New York: Salsa Is Also a Political Force,' Billboard , June 12, 1976, p. S-6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Regarding the black smile, as is well known, and still the case, black laughter and glee have always been symbolically loaded, especially in public spaces open to the gaze of others”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ellison, Shadow and Act , pp. 225-26; and Toni Morrison, 'Introduction: Friday on the Potomac,' in Raceing Justice, Engendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality (New York: Pantheon, 1992), pp. xii-xiii.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three decades later, the reggaeton phenomenon would perform the same function, on a larger scale.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, Sembène's work suggests the possibility of a fuller, more informed history of the 'camp.'”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The goal is to highlight the possible ways a deep engagement with popular culture might enhance our understanding of developments in the formal political arena”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Sembène's film foregrounds the colonial factor and makes the connections between this history and the events that took place in Europe leading up to and during World War II.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ousmane Sembène's film Camp de Thiaroye (1985; New Yorker Films Video, 1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this chapter, and the next, I also contend that the standard discourses of citizenship might be questioned in light of their dependence on the trope of the nigger.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“African Americans, deg7Fned broadly, European blacks, and continental Africans are all currently grappling with distinct but overlapping forms of demoralization, Afro-pessimism, and postcolonial melancholia, to borrow-out of context-a phrasing from Paul Gilroy, and with a hegemonic incentive structure that posits that black imaginations should neither trouble the aesthetic/politics boundary nor”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Paul Gilroy
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the qualifier 'black' cannot be unthinkingly attached to the concept of the public sphere, given that nonwhites, like women, have lived much of their lives on the fault lines separating the public and private spheres as conventionally defined.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The current moment is characterized much more by its acceptance of these dominant scripts of modernity than by a willingness to challenge the slippery and changing bases on which blacks have been excommunicated by the reig7Fcation and deig7Fcation of the modern.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even our references to alternative modernities suggest a primary template that might at best allow certain variations on a relatively g7Fxed score.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Examples of popular culture's ability to focus attention on a specific issue would include, in the American context, Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin , Stevie Wonder's 'Happy Birthday,' and Spike Lee's 4 Little Girls .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Stevie Wonder's 'Happy Birthday'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Spike Lee's 4 Little Girls
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The authors state this as an assumption.
Modern life begins with slavery.
“I am working here with the assumptions that underpin Toni Morrison's suggestion that '[M]odern life begins with slavery,' and Paul Gilroy's conceptualization of the black Atlantic as being necessarily a counterculture of modernity.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The black Atlantic is necessarily a counterculture of modernity.
“I am working here with the assumptions that underpin Toni Morrison's suggestion that '[M]odern life begins with slavery,' and Paul Gilroy's conceptualization of the black Atlantic as being necessarily a counterculture of modernity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The outside is always inside: the marginalized are invisible, implicated, disempowered, unrecognized but omnipresent.
“in certain respects, the outside is always inside: invisible perhaps, implicated and disempowered, unrecognized but omnipresent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The identities of the dominant order are inevitably defined in opposition to, and as a negation of, the representations of the marginalized.
“The identities of the latter are inevitably deg7Fned in opposition to, and as a negation of, the representations of the marginalized, and in certain respects, the outside is always inside: invisible perhaps, implicated and disempowered, unrecognized but omnipresent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Race remains a major, arguably the major, structuring contributor to the shape and substance of American politics.
“Because race is still a major, arguably the major, structuring contributor to the shape and substance of American politics”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black elected officials are, in the aggregate, more economically and socially liberal and progressive than the communities they represent.
“black elected ofg7Fcials are also, in the aggregate, more economically and socially liberal and progressive than the communities they represent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The standard narratives of modernity are inevitably frustrating and racially bound.
“the inevitable frustrations and racially bound, unproductive labor associated with the efforts to work within the standard narratives of modernity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cultural realm is always in play and already politically significant terrain.
“the cultural realm is always in play and already politically signig7Fcant terrain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The black counterpublic/white public sphere divide was sanctified before the last two decades of the twentieth century.
“assumptions about the sanctity of the black counterpublic/white public sphere divide”
The paper relies on this without support.
The integrationist/nationalist divide was previously the primary axis of African American discourse.
“the primacy and stridency of the integrationist/nationalist debate subsides”
The paper relies on this without support.
Another factor that reduces the pressure on black Democratic members of Congress to respond to the concerns of their constituents is their high rate of incumbency.
“Another factor that reduces the pressure on black Democratic members of Congress to respond to the concerns of their constituents is their high rate of incumbency.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Districts that are majority black (and Hispanic) tend to be less competitive.
“Districts that are majority black (and Hispanic) tend to be less competitive.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The need to grapple with and work through this dominant and singular phenomenon (modernity).
“Again, in common with Scott, I am assuming the need to grapple with and work through this dominant and singular phenomenon.”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McKittrick, K. (2014) · The Black Scholar · doi:10.1080/00064246.2014.11413684 · Cited by 695
Wilson, I. G. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195337372.001.0001 · Cited by 156
Towards decolonial praxis: reconfiguring the human and the curriculum
Desai, K., & Sanya, B. N. (2016) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1221893 · Cited by 70
The Sociology of Urban Black America
Hunter, M. A., & Robinson, Z. F. (2016) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074356 · Cited by 67
Context, Black Empowerment, and African American Political Participation
Spence, L. K., & McClerking, H. K. (2010) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x09360001 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Iton, R.
- Corresponding author
- Iton, Richard
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-06-06
- OpenAlex
- W2496517460
- Semantic Scholar
- c922474a7637e6a9ffbf2a89f923c372252c534d
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Theater, Performance, and Music History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
- Keywords
- Black popular culture, Black artists, politics of art, civil rights movement, Paul Robeson, Lorraine Hansberry, Richard Pryor, Bob Marley, Erykah Badu, protest politics, electoral politics, policy making, class, gender, sexuality, diaspora, coloniality, Black political power
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Search of the Black Fantastic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195178463.001.0001
- The paper
- Iton, R. (2008). In Search of the Black Fantastic. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780195178463.001.0001