The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Another Cosmopolitanism
Abstract
Presents an argument that since the UN Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, we have entered a phase of global civil society which is governed by cosmopolitan norms of universal justice - norms which are difficult for some to accept as legitimate since they are in conflict with democratic ideals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“I think this is true, for example, of Habermas ' s (2000) and Benhabib ' s (2006) accounts of postnational democracy, or Connolly ' s (2000) account of rhizomatic democracy.”
From Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism (2015) · cites this paper as Benhabib ' s (2006)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle
Näsström, S. (2010) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x · Cited by 563
Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism
Kymlicka, W. (2015) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0017-4 · Cited by 382
Between Decision and Deliberation: Political Paradox in Democratic Theory
Honig, B. (2007) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055407070098 · Cited by 188
Ashutosh, I., & Mountz, A. (2011) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621025.2011.534914 · Cited by 242
Claiming Rights across Borders: International Human Rights and Democratic Sovereignty
Benhabib, S. (2009) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409990244 · Cited by 241
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Benhabib, S.
- Corresponding author
- Benhabib, Seyla
- ORCID
- Benhabib, Seyla
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2006-11-16
- OpenAlex
- W4249370418
- Cited by
- 1,072
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 306 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 90
- FWCI
- 35.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- cosmopolitanism, global civil society, universal justice, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, democracy, democratic values, global governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
