The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What’s Positive about Positive Psychology?
Abstract
This chapter considers four possible meanings of the “positive” in positive psychology: that positive psychology involves doing “positive science” (basic and applied research aimed at improving human life); that it involves assuming that human nature is inherently “good” as a theoretical tenet; that it involves merely appreciating formerly unappreciated but admirable aspects of human nature; and that it involves studying the positive rather than the negative extreme of particular topics (i.e. forgiveness, not revenge; elation, not depression). It suggests that positive psychology focus on “personality on up”; only there does the term “positive” make sense, because positive has meaning with reference to human experience. In contrast, positive physics, positive chemistry, or positive neuroscience make less sense as fields of study, except insofar as they benefit human experience and life. The chapter defends positive psychology against the individualistic bias critique by pointing out that truly positive individuality is also connected individuality, and that only the less admirable forms of Western individualism (materialism, narcissism, egocentrism) work against positive functioning at the relational and cultural levels.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, by taking an appreciative approach (King, 2008; Sheldon, 2011), we have attempted to remain mindful of the broader scope of TMT, and point out that although death awareness can, at times, function to generate some negative forces, it can also function to move people along more positive trajectories and contribute to the good life.”
From When Death is Good for Life: Considering the Positive Trajectories of Terror Management (2012) · cites this paper as Sheldon, 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When Death is Good for Life: Considering the Positive Trajectories of Terror Management
Vail, K. E., Juhl, J., Arndt, J., Vess, M., Routledge, C., & Rutjens, B. T. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312440046 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheldon, K. M.
- Corresponding author
- Sheldon, Kennon M.
- ORCID
- Sheldon, Kennon M.
- Venue
- Designing Positive Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-01-03
- Pages
- 421-429
- OpenAlex
- W2488080648
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- positive psychology, positive science, human nature, individualism, individuality, critique of individualism, materialism, narcissism, self-centeredness, positive functioning, human experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review