The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Random Geometric Graphs
Abstract
This book sets out a body of rigorous mathematical theory for finite graphs with nodes placed randomly in Euclidean d-space according to a common probability density, and edges added to connect points that are close to each other. As an alternative to classical random graph models, these geometric graphs are relevant to the modelling of real networks having spatial content, arising for example in wireless communications, parallel processing, classification, epidemiology, astronomy, and the internet. Their study illustrates numerous techniques of modern stochastic geometry, including Stein's method, martingale methods, and continuum percolation. Typical results in the book concern properties of a graph G on n random points with edges included for interpoint distances up to r, with the parameter r dependent on n and typically small for large n. Asymptotic distributional properties are derived for numerous graph quantities. These include the number of copies of a given finite graph embedded in G, the number of isolated components isomorphic to a given graph, the empirical distributions of vertex degrees, the clique number, the chromatic number, the maximum and minimum degree, the size of the largest component, the total number of components, and the connectivity of the graph.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We point out that in the context of ordinary homology (i.e.not persistent homology), M. Penrose and others have developed a theory of “geometric random graphs” and have proved various results concerning the Betti numbers of complexes attached to such graphs (see [54]).”
From Topology and data (2009) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“This observation means that these networks are not random geometric graphs37, and that their structure does not exactly reflect the geometry of the underlying hyperbolic space.”
From Network Cosmology (2012) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 2,480
Metadata
- Authors
- Penrose, M.
- Corresponding author
- Penrose, Mathew
- ORCID
- Penrose, Mathew
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W630423399
- Cited by
- 2,480
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 122 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 125 · 2016: 131 · 2015: 144 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 142 · 2012: 155
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
- Keywords
- random geometric graphs, spatial networks, continuum percolation, Stein's method, martingale method, asymptotic distribution, degree distribution, clique number, chromatic number, largest component size, graph connectivity, Internet topology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review