The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proto-Semitic and Proto-Arabic origins of grammatical ši
Abstract
Abstract Grammatical šī in Arabic shares more surface similarities and functional affinities with Proto-Semitic 3rd person pronouns and other Semitic function words than it does with the Arabic word for ‘thing’, itself probably deriving later from an indefinite determiner šī. Of the few genuine cases of degrammaticalization, the best-supported is the movement from indefinite determiners to content words. The other functionalities of the existential particle šī arose from a Proto-Semitic demonstrative or presentative, not along a unidirectional cline but through a potentially overlapping series of lateral shifts, changes, neither more nor less grammatical, representing movement on the cline but not up or down it. The development of negative -š in Arabic conforms to Croft’s negative-indefinite cycle, not Jespersen’s.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilmsen, D.
- Corresponding author
- Wilmsen, David
- ORCID
- Wilmsen, David
- Venue
- Arabic Indefinites, Interrogatives, and Negators
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2014-10-30
- Pages
- 148-179
- OpenAlex
- W2482455410
- Semantic Scholar
- a637385b5e6648e3bd2e8292fb3108c8171ff9f6
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Keywords
- Proto-Semitic, degrammaticalization, indefinite determiners, demonstratives, presentatives, Jespersen's cycle, Arabic pronouns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review