Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLinguistic Studies and Language AcquisitionSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The J_ToBi Model of Japanese Intonation

Open access
Venditti, Jennifer J·2005·Prosodic Typology

Abstract

This chapter describes the prosodic structure of Japanese, and the transcription of intonational patterns using the Japanese ToBI (J-ToBI) system. It discusses the role of pitch accent in Japanese, as well as the levels of phrasing present in the prosodic hierarchy. This structure is compared and contrasted with the intonation systems of other languages that also have been described using the ToBI framework. It provides details of the labels used in a Japanese ToBI transcription, along with a discussion of the motivation for, and issues concerning, many of these labels. It then highlights the differences between J-ToBI and the well-known Beckman–Pierrehumbert model. Finally, it describes efforts toward the automatization of J-ToBI labelling, and summarizes results of labeller agreement studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 11 · Cited by 212

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 1994, Guidelines for ToBI Labelling
  2. 1994, The ToBI Annotation Conventions
  3. 1986, Intonational Structure in Japanese and English, Phonology Yearbook, 10.1017/S095267570000066X · DOI
  4. 1996, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing
  5. 1997, The ToBI (Tones and Break Indices) System and Its Application to Japanese [in Japanese], Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan
  6. 1984, Analysis of Voice Fundamental Frequency Contours for Declarative Sentences of Japanese, Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 10.1250/ast.5.233 · DOI
  7. 1971, Proceedings of the International Congress on Acoustics
  8. 1988, Proceedings of the Western Conference on Formal Linguistics
  9. 1992, The Influence of Pitch Range, Duration, Amplitude and Spectral Features on the Interpretation of the Rise-fall-rise Intonation Contour in English, Journal of Phonetics
  10. 1993, The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody
  11. 1995, Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
  12. 1996, A Prosodic Analysis of Three Types of Wh-phrases in Korean, Language and Speech
  13. 1963, A Collection of Papers on Japanese Accent
  14. 1994, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics
  15. 1997, Grammar and Sound
  16. 2002, Proceedings ofthejth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing
  17. 2000, Proceedings of the Science and Technology Agency Priority Program Symposium on Spontaneous Speech: Corpus and Processing Technology
  18. 1994, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing
  19. 1994, Tail Pitch Movement and the Intermediate Phrase in Japanese
  20. 1988, Japanese Tone Structure
  21. 1990, Intentions in Communication
  22. 1994, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing
  23. 1984, The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese
  24. 1992, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing
  25. 1981, Timing Relationship Between Articulation and Fo Lowering for Word Accent [in Japanese], Gengo Kenkyû
  26. 1995, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics
  27. 2000, Discourse Structure and Attentional Salience Effects on Japanese Intonation
  28. 1996, Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition
  29. 1998, Proceedings of the 3rd ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis
  30. 2000, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing

Metadata

Authors
Venditti, J. J.
Corresponding author
Venditti, Jennifer J
Venue
Prosodic Typology
Published
2005-01-27
Pages
172-200
OpenAlex
W2498996464
Cited by
212
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 37
FWCI
17.25
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
Japanese intonation, ToBI, pitch accent, prosodic structure, prosodic hierarchy, phrasing, intonational patterns, automatic transcription

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The J_ToBi Model of Japanese Intonation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007
The paper
Venditti, J. J. (2005). The J_ToBi Model of Japanese Intonation. Prosodic Typology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199249633.003.0007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.