The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metropolitan Province
Abstract
Continued friction over Ireland's constitutional status found expression in key texts of patriot constitutional argument by William Molyneux and Jonathan Swift. Following the Wood's Halfpence controversy the emergence of a working arrangement between government and local undertakers, based on a sharing of official patronage, brought greater stability. Charles Lucas's challenge to the system, coming from outside the political elite, was ruthlessly crushed. But the Money Bill dispute of 1753-6, initiated by the leading undertaker Henry Boyle in response to a challenge from the rising Ponsonby interest and the primate George Stone, divided the political elite and aroused popular political discontent.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It nevertheless slowly enacted several measures in response to the rising tide of legislation, such as an order in 1769 'that no bill of a private nature shall take rise in the house but by petition from the party desiring such a bill, and after a report from a committee appointed to enquire into the allegations of such a petition'.”
From Jamaican Legislation and the Transatlantic Constitution, 1664–1839 (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jamaican Legislation and the Transatlantic Constitution, 1664–1839
GRAHAM, A. (2018) · The Historical Journal · doi:10.1017/s0018246x1700022x · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Connolly, S. J.
- Corresponding author
- Connolly, S. J.
- ORCID
- Connolly, S. J.
- Venue
- Divided Kingdom
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-08-28
- Pages
- 208-248
- OpenAlex
- W4255743035
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies of British Isles
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Irish and British Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political and Economic history of UK and US
- Keywords
- William Molyneux, Jonathan Swift, undertakers, patronage, Charles Lucas, political elites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
