The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comedy and Feminist Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible: A Subversive Collaboration
Abstract
Comedy is both relative, linked to a time and culture, and universal, found pervasively across time and culture. The Hebrew Bible contains comedy of this relative, yet universal, nature. This book engages the Hebrew Bible via a comic reading and brings that reading into conversation with feminist‐critical interpretation, in resistance to any lingering stereotype that comedy is fundamentally non‐serious or that feminist critique is fundamentally unsmiling. Dividing comic elements into categories of literary devices, psychological/social features, and psychological/social function, this work examines the narratives of a number of biblical characters for evidence of these comic elements. The characters include the trickster matriarchs, the women involved in the infancy of Moses, Rahab, Deborah and Jael, Delilah, three of David's wives (Michal, Abigail, Bathsheba), Jezebel, Ruth, and Esther. Nine particularly instructive points of contact between comedy and feminist interpretation emerge: both resist definition, exist amid a self/other, subject/object dichotomy, emphasize and utilize context, promote creativity, acknowledge the concept of distancing, work towards revelation, are subversive, are concerned with containment and control, and enable survival. The use of comedy as an interpretative lens for the Hebrew Bible is not without difficulties for feminist interpretation. While maintaining an uncomfortable, even painful, awareness of the hold patriarchy retains on the Hebrew Bi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is usually assumed both by those retelling Moses' story and by commentators on the biblical narrative that Moses cannot have grown up safely in the Egyptian court with his Hebrew identity generally known.”
From PROPHECIES AND PRINCESSES: MOSES IN EGYPT AND ETHIOPIA ACCORDING TO JOSEPHUS (2022) · cites this paper as Jackson 2012:76
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
PROPHECIES AND PRINCESSES: MOSES IN EGYPT AND ETHIOPIA ACCORDING TO JOSEPHUS
Westwood, U. (2022) · Akroterion · doi:10.7445/67--1047
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, M.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Melissa
- ORCID
- Jackson, Melissa
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-07-26
- OpenAlex
- W4238324617
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Theological Perspectives and Practices
- Keywords
- comedy, Hebrew Bible, feminist interpretation, biblical narrative, Rahab, Delilah, Michal, Abigail, Bathsheba, Jezebel, Ruth, Esther, patriarchy, subversion, revelation, survival, distancing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comedy and Feminist Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible: A Subversive Collaboration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656776.001.0001
- The paper
- Jackson, M. (2012). Comedy and Feminist Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible: A Subversive Collaboration. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199656776.001.0001