The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
The Interactive Stance
Abstract
The fine structure of conversational interaction is of significant interest for wide swathes of the behavioural sciences: linguists, philosophers, psychologists, sociologists, literary scholars, artificial intelligence researchers must all contend with issues relating to the nature of meaning and its sharing among interlocuters, the possibility of repair — the wide range of corrective actions that occur when ‘trouble’ arises in interaction — and the characterization of coherence in interaction. This book presents the results of attempting to create a precise, grammatically rooted, theory of conversation motivated by data from real conversations. It develops KoS, one of the most detailed theories of context in conversation, and uses this to analyze a variety of linguistic constructions characteristic of spoken interaction, many of which have not been previously analyzed formally. KoS has descriptive reach from the micro-conversational (e.g., self-repair at the word level) to macro-level phenomena such as multi-party conversation and the characterization of distinct conversational genres. It draws on extensive corpus studies of the British National Corpus, on evidence from language acquisition, and on computer simulations of language evolution. KoS provides accounts of the opening, middle game, and closing stages of conversation. KoS also offers a new perspective on traditional semantic concerns such as quantification and anaphora. It suggests a new methodological criterion — s…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Ginzburg, J.
- Corresponding author
- Ginzburg, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Ginzburg, Jonathan
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-01-12
- OpenAlex
- W2477784300
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 45.54
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- conversation, self-healing, conversational repair, multi-party conversation, conversational genres, relevance theory, illocutionary force, metacommunication, metadiscourse, quantification, anaphora, compositionality, spoken interaction, British National Corpus, language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review