The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intimate Partner Violence
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with an array of negative health consequences that can include poor general health status, increased health service utilization, stress-related conditions, physical injuries, and death. Common mental health consequences include depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. Many factors, at biological, psychological, and social levels of influences, are correlated with IPV perpetration, yet prominent theoretical models are narrow in focus. This chapter explicates the need for a biopsychosocial model of IPV that is integrative and coherent, and it argues that the social information processing approach can provide an organizing framework for this effort. Factors such as neurocognitive deficits, trauma exposure, and acute alcohol intoxication influence risk for IPV by altering the decoding and interpretation of relationship events and the generation, selection, and evaluation of responses. A more integrative approach to IPV will enhance our ability to understand, prevent, and treat this vexing public health concern.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IPV is linked to detrimental physical health outcomes, such as overall poor health, increased healthcare utilization, stress-related conditions, physical injuries, chronic pain, reproductive issues, poorer pregnancy outcomes, and mortality.
“IPV is also linked to detrimental physical health outcomes, such as overall poor health, increased healthcare utilization, stress-related conditions, physical injuries, chronic pain, reproductive issues, poorer pregnancy outcomes, and mortality”
From Systematic review on the treatment of emotional abuse victimization in women by an intimate partner (2025) · cites this paper as Murphy et al. 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Systematic review on the treatment of emotional abuse victimization in women by an intimate partner
Karakurt, G., Koc, E., D’Silva, R., Oğuztüzün, Ç., Choudhary, A., Goto, T., Gao, K., & Bolen, S. (2025) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-025-00891-4 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, C. M., Norwood, A. E. Q., & Poole, G. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
- Venue
- Interpersonal Relationships and Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-06-03
- Pages
- 156-178
- OpenAlex
- W2485647102
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, biopsychosocial model, social information processing, IPV perpetration, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, neurocognitive impairment, trauma exposure, alcohol intoxication, relationship violence, IPV prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review