The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Governance of Online Creation Communities for the Building of Digital Commons:
Abstract
This chapter addresses the governance of a specific type of common-pool resource, online creation communities (OCCs). OCCs are communities of individuals that mainly interact via a platform of online participation, with the goal of building and sharing a common-pool resource resulting from collaboratively systematizing and integrating dispersed information and knowledge resources. Previous research on the governance of OCCs has been based on analyzing specific aspects of that governance. The literature has lacked a comprehensive and holistic view of what governance means in collective action online. This chapter provides a set of dimensions that define the governance of OCCs and that include consideration of infrastructure provision. This chapter uses the knowledge commons framework that builds on the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. The empirical data are drawn from a statistical analysis of fifty cases and four case studies on OCCs (Wikipedia, Flickr, wikiHow, and Openesf).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While large CBPP communities managing global digital commons develop a common cultural context (Fuster-Morell, 2014)”
From Analysis of the Potentials of Blockchain for the Governance of Global Digital Commons (2021) · cites this paper as Fuster-Morell, 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance
Rozas, D., Tenorio-Fornés, A., Díaz-Molina, S., & Hassan, S. (2021) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211002526 · Cited by 185
Analysis of the Potentials of Blockchain for the Governance of Global Digital Commons
Rozas, D., Tenorio-Fornés, A., & Hassan, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2021.577680 · Cited by 45
Rozas, D., & Huckle, S. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24393 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Morell, M. F.
- Corresponding author
- Morell, Mayo Fuster
- ORCID
- Morell, Mayo Fuster
- Venue
- Governing Knowledge Commons
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-09-02
- Pages
- 281-312
- OpenAlex
- W2498759964
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Wikis in Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Keywords
- governance, digital commons, knowledge commons, common-pool resources, infrastructure provision, institutional analysis and development, Wikipedia, Flickr, WikiHow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Governance of Online Creation Communities for the Building of Digital Commons:. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.003.0009
- The paper
- Morell, M. F. (2014). Governance of Online Creation Communities for the Building of Digital Commons:. Governing Knowledge Commons. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199972036.003.0009