Cited by 42Disability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and RepresentationRetirement, Disability, and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Disability and Equity at Work

Abstract

Despite international and national guarantees of equal rights, there is still a great deal of work to be done to achieve equality in employment globally for individuals with disabilities. In Organization for Economic Development and Co-operation countries, the employment rate of persons with disabilities was just greater than 40%, compared with 75% for persons without a disability, and in many low- and middle-income countries the employment rates were even lower. There are many reasons why persons with disabilities fare poorly in the labor market. Some have to do with inequitable access to resources that matter for work, including access to education and credit and funding, as well as physical access to buildings and transportation. Employers tend to underestimate the productivity of a worker with a disability and overestimate the cost of an alternate work arrangement, and are unaware of public policies and programs designed to address potential challenges. Disability and Equity at Work is the first book to document what can be done to improve the employment situation of persons with disabilities around the world. Increasing employment rates makes economic sense. Some estimates put the forgone income of having people with disabilities outside the labor market at about 5% to 7% of a given country’s gross domestic product. Disability and Equity at Work identifies successful strategies at every stage of a worker’s career. Bringing together evidence-based recommendations and in-depth case studies of successful policies and programs around the world, this edited volume provides innovative and effective solutions to the challenges faced by persons with disabilities in the job market. Chapter contributors include leaders from international organizations, government, civil society, and academia, including experts from United Nations agencies, national governments and regional bodies, leaders in nongovernmental advocacy and research organizations, and senior academics in the field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199981212.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Heymann, J., Stein, M. A., & Moreno, G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Published
2014-01-14
OpenAlex
W372315873
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
2.45
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
people with disabilities, employment of people with disabilities, labor market inclusion, employment equity, disability employment policy, employer perceptions, physical accessibility, low- and middle-income countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review