CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,072Political Philosophy and EthicsInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyLegal Rights and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Another Cosmopolitanism

Benhabib, Seyla·2006·Oxford University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183221.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Presents an argument that since the UN Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, we have entered a phase of global civil society which is governed by cosmopolitan norms of universal justice - norms which are difficult for some to accept as legitimate since they are in conflict with democratic ideals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183221.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Benhabib, S.
Corresponding author
Benhabib, Seyla
ORCID
Benhabib, Seyla
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
2006-11-16
DOI
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183221.001.0001
OpenAlex
W4249370418
Cited by
1,072
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 306 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 90
FWCI
35.16
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
Keywords
cosmopolitanism, global civil society, universal justice, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, democracy, democratic values, global governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review