The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Responsibility for Justice
Abstract
When the noted political philosopher Iris Marion Young died in 2006, her death was mourned as the passing of “one of the most important political philosophers of the past quarter-century” (Cass Sunstein) and as an important and innovative thinker working at the conjunction of a number of important topics: global justice; democracy and difference; continental political theory; ethics and international affairs; and gender, race and public policy. This book discusses our responsibilities to address “structural” injustices in which we among many are implicated (but for which we are not to blame), often by virtue of participating in a market, such as buying goods produced in sweatshops, or participating in booming housing markets that leave many homeless. The book argues that addressing these structural injustices requires a new model of responsibility, which it calls the “social connection” model. The book develops this idea by clarifying the nature of structural injustice; developing the notion of political responsibility for injustice and how it differs from older ideas of blame and guilt; and finally how we can then use this model to describe our responsibilities to others no matter who we are and where we live.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Synthetic media is a structural threat to democracy that collapses the evidentiary foundations of public reason.
“Drawing on Young's (2011) distinction between isolated harms and structural injustice, this chapter identifies synthetic media as a structural threat to democracy that collapses the evidentiary foundations of public reason.”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as Young's (2011)
Settlers bear responsibility to redress the structures that sustain dispossession.
“and so bear responsibility to redress them (see Lu, 2017; Young, 2011).”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Young, 2011
Settlers participate in the structures that sustain dispossession and propagate the background narratives that legitimate it.
“we participate in the structures that sustain dispossession and propagate the background narratives that legitimate it”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Young, 2011
Subsequent generations of settlers are not morally innocent of Indigenous dispossession.
“It is not immediately intuitive, as Stilz suggests, that subsequent generations of settlers are ' morally innocent ' of Indigenous dispossession.”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Young, 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tormos, F. (2017) · Politics, Groups, and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2017.1385494 · Cited by 119
Expert responsibility in AI development
Hedlund, M., & Persson, E. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01498-9 · Cited by 39
A Third Conception of Epistemic Injustice
Nikolaidis, A. C. (2021) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-021-09760-1 · Cited by 28
Stepping-stone solidarity: The normative foundation of the social investment welfare state
Bagadirov, A., Hemerijck, A., & Puertas Roig, P. (2025) · Acta Sociologica · doi:10.1177/00016993251319682 · Cited by 10
Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory
Jourdeuil, K. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423924000416 · Cited by 2
Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project
(2026) · University of Maribor Press · doi:10.18690/um.feri.2.2026
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, I. M., & Nussbaum, M.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4301416904
- Cited by
- 2,083
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 258 · 2025: 235 · 2024: 183 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 195 · 2021: 176 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 353 · 2018: 108 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 54.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
- Keywords
- structural injustice, political responsibility, social connection model, Iris Marion Young, global justice, market participation, sweatshops, housing market, homelessness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review