The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Event-related potentials and language comprehension
Abstract
This chapter reviews existing literature on event-related potential (ERP). The first section reviews ERP studies aimed at investigating word-level processes (recognizing isolated words and words in single-word contexts). The second section focuses on sentence-level processes (recognizing words in sentence contexts and computing syntactic structure).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.
McClelland, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.4.287 · Cited by 1,298
The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(85)90017-8 · Cited by 418
Cited by
The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters.
Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0021446 · Cited by 894
Metadata
- Authors
- Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J.
- Venue
- Electrophysiology of Mind
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1996-09-05
- Pages
- 171-216
- OpenAlex
- W2506158729
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.72
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Event-related potentials and language comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524168.003.0006
- The paper
- Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1996). Event-related potentials and language comprehension. Electrophysiology of Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780198524168.003.0006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
