The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry
Abstract
The book discusses the diversity of mechanisms by which prey can avoid or survive attacks by predators, both from ecological and evolutionary perspectives. There is a particular focus on sensory mechanisms by which prey can avoid being detected, avoid being identified, signal (perhaps sometimes dishonestly) to predators that they are defended or unpalatable. The book is divided into three sections. The first considers detection avoidance through, for example, background matching, disruptive patterning, countershading and counterillumination, or transparency and reflective silvering. The second section considers avoiding or surviving an attack if detection and identification by the predator has already taken place (i.e., secondary defences). The key mechanism of this section is aposematism: signals that warn the predator that a particular prey type is defended. One particularly interesting aspect of this is the sharing of the same signal by more than one defended species (the phenomenon of Mullerian mimicry). The final section considers deception of predators. This may involve an undefended prey mimicking a defended species (Batesian mimicry), or signals that deflect predator’s attention or signals that startle predators. The book provides the first comprehensive survey of adaptive coloration in a predator-prey context in thirty years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution
Kauffman, S. A. (1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195079517.001.0001 · Cited by 7,855
Sequestration of Defensive Substances from Plants by Lepidoptera
Nishida, R. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145121 · Cited by 652
Klump, G. M., & Shalter, M. D. (1984) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1984.tb01365.x · Cited by 378
MIMETIC ASSEMBLAGES OF SIBLING SPECIES OF LYCID BEETLES
Linsley, E. G., Eisner, T., & Klots, A. B. (1961) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1961.tb03126.x · Cited by 97
Cited by
Hanlon, R. T., Chiao, C.-C., Mäthger, L. M., Barbosa, A., Buresch, K. C., & Chubb, C. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0270 · Cited by 265
Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2013) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12014 · Cited by 152
Ohno, T., & Miyatake, T. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3750 · Cited by 109
Bagge, L. E., Kinsey, S. T., Gladman, J., & Johnsen, S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.162362 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruxton, G. D., Sherratt, T. N., & Speed, M. P.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2004-10-21
- OpenAlex
- W4241454816
- Cited by
- 1,182
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 36.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528609.001.0001
- The paper
- Ruxton, G. D., Sherratt, T. N., & Speed, M. P. (2004). Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780198528609.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.