Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics
Abstract
Abstract This book provides a firm grounding in those techniques needed to derive analytic solutions to relevant model problems. The book begins with a brief review of the mathematical foundations of quantum theory, especially those relevant to the description of atoms and optical fields and their coherent interactions. The following chapters treat the operators and states required, the rules for manipulating these, and the techniques commonly employed for calculating their statistical properties. A chapter is devoted to the important topic of dissipative processes and to the effects that these have on quantum optical systems. The final chapter discusses dressed states, that is, the eigenstates of interacting systems, including those that are dissipative. Fourteen short appendices summarize the more important topics in mathematics required in the book or present the lengthier calculations not included in the chapters. A selective bibliography is given at the end of the book.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) configuration can be encoded in a CV quantum neural network by turning off non-Gaussian gates and measuring outputs using photon detectors.
“Any GBS configuration can be encoded in a CV quantum neural network by (i) turning off the non-Gaussian gates and (ii) measuring the outputs using photon detectors.”
From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [106]
A simple expression for an eigenstate of the x quadrature with eigenvalue x can be found in Appendix 4 of Ref. [126].
“A simple expression for an eigenstate of the x quadrature with eigenvalue x can be found in Appendix 4 of Ref. [126]”
From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [126]
Both GBS and CV-IQP circuits have been shown to be intractable to simulate classically.
“Both GBS [106,110] and CV-IQP circuits [109,111] have been shown to be intractable to simulate classically.”
From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [106]
Cites
Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics
Mandel, L., & Wolf, E. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644105 · Cited by 8,356 · see citing works
Gardiner, C. W. (1991) · Springer Series in Synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09642-0 · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Machine Learning in Feature Hilbert Spaces
Schuld, M., & Killoran, N. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.040504 · Cited by 1,840 · see citing works
Continuous Variable Quantum Information: Gaussian States and Beyond
Adesso, G., Ragy, S., & Lee, A. R. (2014) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1142/s1230161214400010 · Cited by 787 · see citing works
Measures and dynamics of entangled states
Mintert, F., Carvalho, A. R. R., Kuś, M., & Buchleitner, A. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.04.006 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Continuous-variable quantum neural networks
Killoran, N., Bromley, T. R., Arrazola, J. M., Schuld, M., Quesada, N., & Lloyd, S. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033063 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Detailed study of Gaussian boson sampling
Kruse, R., Hamilton, C. S., Sansoni, L., Barkhofen, S., Silberhorn, C., & Jex, I. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032326 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Limits on the deterministic creation of pure single-photon states using parametric down-conversion
Christ, A., & Silberhorn, C. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.023829 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Oscillatory multiband dynamics of free particles: The ubiquity of<i>zitterbewegung</i>effects
Winkler, R., Zülicke, U., & Bolte, J. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.205314 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Zülicke, U., Bolte, J., & Winkler, R. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/9/355 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Quantum metrology of spatial deformation using arrays of classical and quantum light emitters
Sidhu, J. S., & Kok, P. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.063829 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The quantum theory of the Penning trap
Crimin, F., Garraway, B. M., & Verdú, J. (2018) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2017.1393570 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Quantisation of the elliptical Penning trap
Crimin, F., Garraway, B. M., & Verdú, J. L. (2021) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/abfeda · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barnett, S. M., & Radmore, P. M.
- ORCID
- Barnett, Stephen M.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2002-11-14
- OpenAlex
- W1584661976
- Cited by
- 1,211
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum optics, analytical solution, mathematical foundations of quantum theory, energy dissipation, dressed states, optical fields, atoms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review