Notes on Objectual Valuation
Abstract
This chapter draws on the notion of ‘objectual’ practice to investigate a distinctive register of valuation that is becoming increasingly prominent in today’s informational economies. The chapter introduces an expansive, ‘ontological’ understanding of objectual valuation and elaborate this understanding through empirical examples drawn from branding, digital analytics, and environmental art. Each of these fields implements empirical methods, devices, and arrangements that deploy dynamics of objectual valuation. They stand out for their investment in the empirical detection of ‘happening relations’ in ways that do not require the attribution of effects to either subjects or objects, individuals or environments. The chapter discusses the capacities of these types of devices for inter-articulation, the creation of opportunities for valuation by bringing different fields into relation. However, none of these devices constitute objectual valuation as a process of socialization, which the chapter proposes is the critical object of investigation and elaboration in this area.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is unsatisfactory to say that evaluative infrastructures reframe or constitute preexisting types of trust, and equally unsatisfactory to argue that trust is socially constructed: at eBay trust is the result not of constructions but of infrastructural disclosure that brings into being a plane of possibilities that did not exist beforehand.
“Hence, it is unsatisfactory to say that evaluative infrastructures reframe or constitute preexisting types of trust because it is formed and disclosed via evaluative infrastructures that , generate opportunities to connect just like a new highway built into wilderness discloses the opportunity to travel, visit and settle.It is equally unsatisfactory to argue that trust is socially constructed: at”
From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Lury & Marres, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Sørensen, A. S. (2021) · Experimental Museology · doi:10.4324/9780367808433-11-15
- Authors
- Lury, C., & Marres, N.
- Venue
- Making Things Valuable
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2015-08-01
- Pages
- 232-256
- OpenAlex
- W2499411499
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K010689/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Keywords
- valuation, branding, digital analytics, environmental art, socialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review