Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

West African Warfare in Bahia and Cuba: Soldier Slaves in the Atlantic World, 1807-1844

Barcia, Manuel·2014

Abstract

This book seeks to explain how a series of historical events that occurred in a specific geographical area of West Africa from the mid-1790s onwards had an impact upon life in cities and plantations in western Cuba and Bahia. Why did these two geographical areas serve as the theatre for the rise of the Nagôs, the Lucumís, and other West African men and women? The answer, the book argues, relates to the fact that plantation economies supported by unusually large numbers of African-born slaves from the same—or close—geographical and ethnic heritage transformed the rural and urban landscape in both of them. To understand why these two areas followed such similar social patterns of insurgency it is essential to look across the Atlantic. It is not enough to repeat the significance of the African background of Bahian and Cuban slaves or to mention the fact that there was a connection. Establishing the links and making the connections between people and events, with a special emphasis on their warfare experiences, in a coherent manner and through a period of time that spans for over three decades is the primordial task of this study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719038.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Barcia, M.
Published
2014-09-25
Cited by
30
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review