The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solidarity and Its Sources
Abstract
Solidarity among members of a social group must be distinguished from solidarity with outsiders. It has four main components: 1) distinguishing features that bind members together; 2) mutual concern and mutual aid within the group; 3) acknowledgement of collective responsibility; 4) limits on inequality among members. Solidarity is primarily valuable for its instrumental effects: protecting vulnerable members, constraining inequality, and fostering social trust. Five alternative explanations of society-wide solidarity are examined. The expanding circle theory envisages solidarity spreading outwards from small groups as commonalities with outsiders are recognized. The interdependence theory sees solidarity emerging as people recognize their dependence on one other for survival and well-being. The associational theory finds the source of social solidarity in active participation in social and political associations. The identity theory highlights the motivational effects of common identities, especially national identity. Finally, the institutional theory claims that solidarity is created by exposure to impartial institutions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The implications for boundary drawing depend on what one believes about the sources of solidarity in groups whose members do not meet face to face.
“The implications for boundary drawing depend on what one believes about the sources of solidarity in groups whose members do not meet face to face (for some possible answers, see Miller, 2017).”
From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as Miller, 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem
Miller, D. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12707 · Cited by 59
“The implications for boundary drawing depend on what one believes about the sources of solidarity in groups whose members do not meet face to face (for some possible answers, see Miller, 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, D.
- Corresponding author
- Miller, David
- ORCID
- Miller, David
- Venue
- The Strains of Commitment
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2017-04-13
- Pages
- 61-79
- OpenAlex
- W2606632189
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 55.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- social solidarity, mutual aid, collective responsibility, inequality, social trust, interdependence theory, identity theory, national identity, institutional theory, social associations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review