Cited by 103Political Philosophy and EthicsSocial Capital and NetworksSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Solidarity and Its Sources

Miller, David·2017·The Strains of Commitment

Abstract

Solidarity among members of a social group must be distinguished from solidarity with outsiders. It has four main components: 1) distinguishing features that bind members together; 2) mutual concern and mutual aid within the group; 3) acknowledgement of collective responsibility; 4) limits on inequality among members. Solidarity is primarily valuable for its instrumental effects: protecting vulnerable members, constraining inequality, and fostering social trust. Five alternative explanations of society-wide solidarity are examined. The expanding circle theory envisages solidarity spreading outwards from small groups as commonalities with outsiders are recognized. The interdependence theory sees solidarity emerging as people recognize their dependence on one other for survival and well-being. The associational theory finds the source of social solidarity in active participation in social and political associations. The identity theory highlights the motivational effects of common identities, especially national identity. Finally, the institutional theory claims that solidarity is created by exposure to impartial institutions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795452.003.0002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implications for boundary drawing depend on what one believes about the sources of solidarity in groups whose members do not meet face to face.

    “The implications for boundary drawing depend on what one believes about the sources of solidarity in groups whose members do not meet face to face (for some possible answers, see Miller, 2017).”

    From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as Miller, 2017

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem

    Miller, D. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12707 · Cited by 59

    “The implications for boundary drawing depend on what one believes about the sources of solidarity in groups whose members do not meet face to face (for some possible answers, see Miller, 2017).”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Metadata

Authors
Miller, D.
Corresponding author
Miller, David
Venue
The Strains of Commitment
Published
2017-04-13
Pages
61-79
OpenAlex
W2606632189
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
55.82
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
social solidarity, mutual aid, collective responsibility, inequality, social trust, interdependence theory, identity theory, national identity, institutional theory, social associations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review