The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Unity of Consciousness
Open accessAbstract
Bayne examines the idea that a human being can have only a single stream of consciousness at any one point in time. He draws on philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience to defend the claim that consciousness is unified, and he explores the implications for theories of consciousness and for our understanding of the self.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The scienti fi c importance of developing C-tests is clear, for knowing whether a particular kind of entity falls within the distribution of consciousness may have an important bearing on accounts of the nature of consciousness, such as whether it is necessarily uni fi ed [41], comes in degrees [42], or is multiply realized [43,44].”
From Tests for consciousness in humans and beyond (2024) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–404 of 404
Tsarev, A. (2026) · Brain-Apparatus Communication A Journal of Bacomics · doi:10.1080/27706710.2026.2678005
Atmospheres and the Intentionality of Moods
Niikawa, T., & Velasco, P. F. (2026) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.70104
Global subject pressure in nontheistic idealism
Christmann, J. A. (2026) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412526101681
Gut consciousness: a perspective on visceral phenomenal awareness
Hasler, G. (2026) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niag070
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayne, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bayne, Tim
- ORCID
- Bayne, Tim
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2010-10-28
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 7414-7414
- OpenAlex
- W1597932157
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Scholarpedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- unity of consciousness, stream of consciousness, theory of consciousness, self, philosophy of mind, neuroscience of consciousness, psychology of consciousness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
