The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metaphor and Metonymy: Aristotle, Jakobson, Ricoeur, and Others
Abstract
This chapter argues in favour of Roman Jakobson’s privileging of metonymy alongside metaphor as primary linguistic tropes (‘trope’ is to be understood here, in a significant modification of Aristotle’s understanding of metaphor, as deviation from usage perceived or felt as normal). But Jakobson shares with Aristotle, as also with Paul Ricoeur and philosophical theorists at large, the fault of paying too little respect to actual literary practice. The result is that they identify metaphor as the defining characteristic of poetic language, mistakenly ignoring the importance of metonymy as well.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This genre presupposes a surplus of meaning in the wisdom-text that goes beyond mere literal interpretation, and it exhibits a deeply embedded commitment to teleology and epistemological positivism: because God's word, transmitted through his medium Moses, is perfect, it is the exegete's responsibility to employ his capacities to unpack what it was that God meant, i.e. why he said it.50”
From Cosmic Spiritualism among the Pythagoreans, Stoics, Jews and Early Christians (2019) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cited by
Cosmic Spiritualism among the Pythagoreans, Stoics, Jews and Early Christians
Horky, P. S. (2019) · Cosmos in the Ancient World · doi:10.1017/9781108529082.014 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Silk, M.
- Corresponding author
- Silk, Michael
- Venue
- Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2003-03-20
- Pages
- 115-148
- OpenAlex
- W2473650894
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 12 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Keywords
- metaphor, metonymy, Roman Jakobson, Aristotle, Paul Ricoeur, poetic language, literary practice, poetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
