The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Marriage, Celibacy, and Heresy in Ancient Christianity: The Jovinianist Controversy
Abstract
In the later years of the fourth century the monk Jovinian was condemned at Rome and Milan for teaching that all baptized Christians were equal in God's sight and that all would receive an equal reward in heaven regardless of ascetic merit. This book is the first study in English devoted to Jovinian and the controversy sparked by his teaching. In chapter 1 I offer a reconstruction of Jovinian's teaching, uncovering its strong anti‐heretical emphases, exposing its biblical foundations, and relating it to fourth‐century baptismal practice. Subsequent chapters place Jovinian in a variety of contexts: the rise of a Christian aristocracy in the fourth century (chapter 2); the development of an anti‐heretical tradition in the first three centuries (chapter 3); the proliferation of this heresiological discourse in the fourth century (chapter 4); and the history of Marian theology, especially on the matter of Mary's perpetual virginity (chapter 5). In the final two chapters I distinguish the different approaches to marriage, celibacy, and clerical life evinced by Jovinian's opponents (chapter 6), and highlight the ways in which one of these opponents, Jerome, became the object of criticism and accusations of heresy. If there is a single conclusion to be drawn from this study, it is that Jovinian stood much closer to the mainstream of the Christian tradition than previous critics (including his ancient opponents) allowed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This, of course, does not mean that early Christians did not have a detailed and complex marital ethic, as Michel Foucault has demonstrated in the posthumously published fourth volume of the History of Sexuality (Foucault 2018; see also De Wet 2020:1-38; Hunter 2007)”
From The Book of Tobit in early Christianity: Greek and Latin interpretations from the 2nd to the 5th century CE (2020) · cites this paper as Hunter 2007
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
de Wet, C. L. (2020) · HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies · doi:10.4102/hts.v76i4.6138 · Cited by 2
“This, of course, does not mean that early Christians did not have a detailed and complex marital ethic, as Michel Foucault has demonstrated in the posthumously published fourth volume of the History of Sexuality (Foucault 2018; see also De Wet 2020:1–38; Hunter 2007).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunter, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hunter, David G.
- ORCID
- Hunter, David G.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-01-25
- OpenAlex
- W2489540534
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 62.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Augustinian Studies and Theology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
- Keywords
- Jovinian, marriage, celibacy, heresy, baptism, fourth-century Christianity, Mariology, perpetual virginity of Mary, Jerome, clergy life, asceticism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review