Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 146Political Philosophy and EthicsPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryCritical Theory and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social Equality: On What It Means to be Equals

Carina Fourie, Fabian Schuppert, Ivo Wallimann-Helmer·2015·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

The first collected volume on social and relational equality. Addresses a gap in the literature - while many philosophers have pointed to the importance of social equality, it requires much more theoretical development, which this volume aims to provide. Offers a unique answer to the debate about whether or not equality is valuable. Features a foreword by eminent political theorist David Miller Includes new contributions by some of the most well-known contemporary moral and political philosophers, such as Samuel Scheffler and Jonathan Wolff. Is equality valuable? This question dominates many discussions of social justice, which tend to center on whether certain forms of distributive equality are valuable, such as the equal distribution of primary social goods. But these discussions often neglect what is known as social or relational equality. Social equality suggests that equality is foremost about relationships and interactions between people, rather than being primarily about distribution. A number of philosophers have written about the significance of social equality, and it has also played an important role in real-life egalitarian movements, such as feminism and civil rights movements. However, as it has been relatively neglected in comparison to the debates about distributive equality, it requires much more theoretical attention. This volume brings together a collection of ten original essays which present new analyses of social and relational equality in philosophy and…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199331109.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fourie, C., Schuppert, F., & Wallimann-Helmer, I.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2015-01-06
OpenAlex
W1483092127
Cited by
146
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.03
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
Keywords
social equality, relational equality, distributive equality, social justice, egalitarianism, political theory, ethics, feminism, civil rights movement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.