CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 92Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEcosystem dynamics and resilience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1,538 of the 1,538 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biodiversity as spatial insurance: the effects of habitat fragmentation and dispersal on ecosystem functioning

Gonzalez, Andrew, Mouquet, Nicolas, Loreau, Michel·2009·Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Habitat destruction and fragmentation is driving biodiversity loss at local and regional scales, yet the functional effects of this loss are poorly understood. Here, this chapter reviews several concepts that allow us to link local and regional scales of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. First it shows how the species-area relationship can link loss of habitat to delayed loss of diversity and ecosystem functioning in remnant fragments. Second, it shows that non-linear averaging can be used to estimate the impact of spatial variance in biodiversity caused by fragmentation. Finally the chapter uses a metacommunity framework to formalize the spatial insurance hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that dispersal is a key process linking diversity to productivity and stability across fragmented landscapes. The theory this chapter outlines stresses that the knowledge of spatial processes across ecosystems will be essential if we are to understand how habitat fragmentation mediates the ecological and economic impacts of biodiversity loss.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010

Cites

1538 of 1538 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 801–1,000 of 1,538

Research works printed but not linked: 132

  1. Armington,, 1969, A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production., IMF Staff Papers
  2. Aronson,, 2005, Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier
  3. Bailey,, 2007, On the trail of a killer., UC Davis Magazine
  4. Barbier,, 1990, Ivory: the case against the ban., New Scientist
  5. Baumgärtner,, 2006, Natural Science Constraints in Environmental and Resource Economics
  6. Baumgärtner,, 2008, Agrobiodiversity and Economic Development
  7. Bradshaw,, 1987, Restoration Ecology
  8. Bradshaw,, 1980, The Restoration of Land: the Ecology and Reclamation of Derelict Land and Degraded Land
  9. Brown,, 1995, Macroecology
  10. Bullock,, 2002, Dispersal Ecology
  11. Carlander,, 1952, Farm Fish Pond Research in Iowa., The Journal of Wildlife Management, 10.2307/3796634 · DOI
  12. Caruso,, 2005, Evolution
  13. Chapin,, 2000, Summer differences among Arctic ecosystems in regional climate forcing., Journal of Climate, 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013〈2002:SDAAEI〉2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  14. Chiari,, 2005, Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
  15. Chomitz, K. E. (1999) Transferable Development Rights and Forest Protection: an Exploratory Analysis. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Market-Based Instruments for Environmental Protection, July 1999. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
  16. Chong,, 2005, Protective Values of Mangrove and Coral Ecosystems: a Review of Methods and Evidence.
  17. Costanza,, 1997, Nature’s services
  18. Daily,, 2002, The New Economy of Nature.
  19. D’Antonio,, 2005, Species Invasions: Insights into Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeography
  20. Dhôte,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity
  21. Di, 2007, Biodiversity Economics: Principles, Methods and Applications
  22. 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105532 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Duraiappah,, 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis
  24. Finnoff,, 2007, Integrating Economics and Biology for Bioeconomic Risk Assessment/Management of Invasive Species in Agriculture
  25. Fischlin,, 2007, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report
  26. Godbold, J. A. (2008) Marine benthic biodiversity–ecosystem function relations in complex systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen, UK.
  27. Gomez-Aparicio,, 2008, Journal of Ecology
  28. Gonzalez,, 2009, Biodiversity and Human Impacts
  29. Goulder,, 1997, Nature’s Services
  30. Griffin,, 2009, Biodiversity and Human Impacts
  31. Guterman,, 2000, Have ecologists oversold biodiversity? Some scientists question experiments on how numerous species help ecosystems., The Chronicle of Higher Education
  32. Hambäck,, 2001, Ecoscience
  33. Harakunarak,, 2005, Life-saving belts: Post-tsunami reassessment of mangrove ecosystem values and management in Thailand., Tropical Coasts
  34. Hasselwandter,, 1997, Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development
  35. Hättenschwiler,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity
  36. Hector,, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives
  37. Hicks,, 1939, Value and Capital
  38. Hildén,, 2006, Reports of Finnish Environment Institute
  39. Hobbs,, 2006, Foundations of Restoration Ecology
  40. Hollowell,, 2001, Managing Human Dominated Ecosystems
  41. Holt,, 2008, Infectious Disease Ecology: Effects of Ecosystems on Disease and of Disease on Ecosystems
  42. Holt,, 2002, The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity
  43. Hooper,, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives
  44. Huston,, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning
  45. Jactel,, 2005, Forest Diversity and Function
  46. Jones,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity
  47. Körner,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity
  48. Krebs,, 2001, Ecology: the Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance
  49. Landsberg, J. (1999) Response and effect – different reasons for classifying plant functional types under grazing. In Eldridge, D. and Freudenberger, D. (eds.) People and Rangelands: Building the Future. Proceedings of the VIth International Rangeland Congress, Aitkenvale, Queensland.
  50. Laughlin,, 2003, Lack of native propagules in a Pennsylvania, USA, limestone prairie seed bank: futile hopes for a role in ecological restoration., Natural Areas Journal
  51. Lawlor,, 2002, The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity
  52. Lee,, 2007, CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
  53. 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90025-K · DOI
  54. Lomolino,, 2004, Frontiers of Biogeography
  55. Loreau,, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives, 10.1093/oso/9780198515708.001.0001 · DOI
  56. Lortie,, 1999, Ecoscience
  57. MacArthur,, 1972, Geographical Ecology
  58. Mangel,, 1997, The Ecological Detective
  59. MEA, 2005, Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis
  60. Menke,, 2004, Natural Areas Journal
  61. Millennium, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being
  62. Millennium, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis Report
  63. Millennium, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series)
  64. Mooney, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Synthesis and Perspectives
  65. Mouquet, 2005, Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities
  66. Mueller, S. C. (1999) Tons of value in a pound of seed. Proceedings of the 29th California alfalfa Symposium, pp. 76–81. Available online at http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu/-files/pdf/2001NAAICSymposiumAbstracts.pdf
  67. Naeem,, 2000, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
  68. Naeem,, 2001, Scaling Relationships in Experimental Ecology
  69. Naeem,, 2001, Managing Human Dominated Ecosystems
  70. Naeem,, 2003, The Importance of Species: Perspectives on Expendability and Triage
  71. Naeem,, 2006, Foundations of Restoration Ecology: the Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration
  72. Naeem,, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives
  73. Newsome,, 1986, Ecology of Biological Invasions
  74. Nordhaus,, 1999, Nature’s Numbers
  75. Odum,, 1953, Fundamentals of Ecology
  76. Ostfeld,, 2004, Are predators good for your health? Evaluating evidence for top-down regulation of zoonotic disease reservoirs., Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0013:APGFYH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  77. Pautasso,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity
  78. Perrings,, 1995, Biodiversity Loss: Economic and Ecological Issues, 10.1017/CBO9781139174329 · DOI
  79. Petchey,, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Syntheses and Perspectives
  80. Popper,, 1987, The Great Plains: from dust to dust., Planning
  81. Popper,, 2006, The onset of the Buffalo Commons., Journal of the West
  82. Potvin,, 1997, Ecology
  83. Pretty,, 2001, Agricultural Influences on Emissions and Sequestration of Carbon and Emerging Trading Options
  84. Pretzsch,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity
  85. Purvis,, 2000, Extinction., Bioessays, 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12〈1123::AID-BIES10〉3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  86. R, 2008, R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  87. Raffaelli,, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Syntheses and Perspectives
  88. Raffaelli,, 2005, Do marine ecologists do it differently?, Marine Ecology Progress Series
  89. Raffaelli,, 2005, Reinventing the wheel in ecology research? – Response., Science, 10.1126/science.307.5717.1875 · DOI
  90. Ricklefs,, 1999, Ecology
  91. Rosenberg,, 2000, Metawin 2.0 User’s Manual: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis.
  92. Rosenzweig,, 1987, Restoration Ecology: a Synthetic Appraoch to Ecological Research
  93. Royal, 2008, Biodiversity–climate interactions: adaptation, mitigation and human ivelihoods.
  94. Rozzi,, 2004, Ethical implications of yahgan and mapuche indigenous narratives about the birds of the austral temperate forests of South America., Ornitologia Neotropical
  95. Sanz,, 2004, The Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Humans, Climate, and the Natural World
  96. SAS, 1995, JMP Statistics and Graphics Guide
  97. Scherer-Lorenzen,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity, 10.1007/b137862 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Schmid,, 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Synthesis and Perspectives
  99. Schmid,, 2002, Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions
  100. Schmitzberger,, 2005, How farming styles influence biodiversity maintenance in Austrian agricultural landscapes., Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.009 · DOI
  101. Scholes,, 1995, CSIR Report FOR-DEA 918
  102. Scott,, 1998, Seeing Like a State
  103. Shmida,, 1985, Biological determinants of species diversity., Journal of Biogeography, 10.2307/2845026 · DOI
  104. Shvidenko,, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Current State and Trends – Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
  105. Smith,, 2005, Elements of Ecology
  106. Soule,, 1992, Farming in Nature’s Image
  107. Srivastava,, Diversity has consistent top-down, but not bottom-up, effects on decomposition., Ecology
  108. Stacey,, 2003, Genotype and temperature influence pea aphid resistance to a fungal entomopathogen., Physiological Entomology, 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2003.00309.x · DOI
  109. Stephens,, 1986, Foraging theory
  110. Stone,, 1999, Entomology
  111. Stoneham,, 2007, Biodiversity Economics: Principles, Methods and Applications
  112. Stroup,, 1995, The Endangered Species Act: making endangered species the enemy., Political Economy Research Center Policy Series PS-3
  113. Sumner,, 2006, Bee-economics and the leap in pollination fees., Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics Update
  114. Swanson,, 1995, The Economics and Ecology of Biodiversity Loss.
  115. Symstad,, 2006, Open-file report 2006–1282
  116. Tilman,, 2000, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
  117. Tilman,, 1997, Spatial Ecology
  118. Trenbath,, 1974, Advances in Agronomy
  119. Turpie,, 2001, Accounting for Stock and Flow Values of Wooded Land Resources, Methods and Results from South Africa
  120. United, 1999, Global Environmental Outlook
  121. United, 2007, Global Environmental Outlook 4
  122. USDA-NRCS, 1997, National Range and Pasture Handbook
  123. Van, 2006, Restoration Ecology: the New Frontier
  124. van Noordwijk, M., Kuncoro, S., Martin, E., Joshi, L., Saipothong, P., Areskoug, V., and O’Connor, T. (2005) Donkeys, carrots, sticks and roads to a market for environmental services: rapid agrobiodiversity appraisal for the PES – ICDP continuum. 2005. Paper presented at the DIVERSTIAS First Open Science Conference, Oaxaca, November.
  125. Vilà,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity
  126. Vitousek,, 1993, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function
  127. Webb,, 2000, Rhodora
  128. Widawsky,, 1998, Farmers, Gene Banks, and Crop Breeding
  129. Wilson,, 1992, The Diversity of Life
  130. Wirth,, 2005, The Functional Significance of Forest Diversity
  131. Wood,, 2000, Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Agroecosystems
  132. World, 1987, Our Common Future

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 92

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gonzalez, A., Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M.
ORCID
Venue
Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Published
2009-07-30
Pages
134-146
DOI
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010
OpenAlex
W2481234140
Cited by
92
References
1,538
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.81
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
habitat fragmentation, biodiversity loss, ecosystem functioning, dispersal, species-area relationship, metacommunity theory, local and regional scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review