The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ioannis Kakridis and Neoanalysis
Abstract
Abstract Ioannis Kakridis created the method of Homeric scholarship known as Neoanalysis. Starting from the Unitarian belief that the Iliad is the work of one great poet, he also drew on Analytical scholarship. Where, however, Analysts detected inartistic clumsiness and signs of multiple authorship, Kakridis saw poetic creativity and Homeric artistry in the appropriation and adaptation of motifs, speeches, and scenes present in pre-Homeric epic, folklore, and popular song, often by transferring material from one character or myth to another. Kakridis discovered in Homeric epic structural motifs and narrative techniques familiar from medieval and modern Greek folktales and popular songs. He suggested that there had been analogous, pre-Homeric folktales and songs on which the poet drew for his own artistic purposes. Kakridis shared with M. Parry an understanding of poetic tradition based not only on philological scholarship, but on a somewhat romanticizing approach to the heroic world of Homeric epic.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Schein, S. L.
- Corresponding author
- Schein, Seth L.
- Venue
- Homeric Epic and its Reception
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2015-11-01
- Pages
- 127-136
- OpenAlex
- W2494702259
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Keywords
- neoanalysis, Homeric scholarship, Iliad, Homeric authorship, analytical theory, Greek folklore, folk tales, poetic tradition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review