Cited by 0Classical Antiquity StudiesClassical Studies and PhilologyFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ioannis Kakridis and Neoanalysis

Schein, Seth L.·2015·Homeric Epic and its Reception

Abstract

Abstract Ioannis Kakridis created the method of Homeric scholarship known as Neoanalysis. Starting from the Unitarian belief that the Iliad is the work of one great poet, he also drew on Analytical scholarship. Where, however, Analysts detected inartistic clumsiness and signs of multiple authorship, Kakridis saw poetic creativity and Homeric artistry in the appropriation and adaptation of motifs, speeches, and scenes present in pre-Homeric epic, folklore, and popular song, often by transferring material from one character or myth to another. Kakridis discovered in Homeric epic structural motifs and narrative techniques familiar from medieval and modern Greek folktales and popular songs. He suggested that there had been analogous, pre-Homeric folktales and songs on which the poet drew for his own artistic purposes. Kakridis shared with M. Parry an understanding of poetic tradition based not only on philological scholarship, but on a somewhat romanticizing approach to the heroic world of Homeric epic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589418.003.0010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Schein, S. L.
Corresponding author
Schein, Seth L.
Venue
Homeric Epic and its Reception
Published
2015-11-01
Pages
127-136
OpenAlex
W2494702259
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Keywords
neoanalysis, Homeric scholarship, Iliad, Homeric authorship, analytical theory, Greek folklore, folk tales, poetic tradition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review