Cited by 94Medieval and Early Modern JusticeIslamic Studies and HistoryOttoman Empire History and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Islamic Law in ActionAuthority, Discretion, and Everyday Experiences in Mamluk Egypt

Stilt, Kristen·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

A dynamic account of the practice of Islamic law, this book focuses on the actions of a particular legal official, the muhtasib, whose vast jurisdiction included all public behavior. In the cities of Cairo and neighboring Fustat during the Mamluk period (1250-1517), the men who held the position of muhtasib acted as regulators of markets and public spaces generally. They traversed their jurisdictions carrying out the duty to command right and forbid wrong, and were as much a part of the legal landscape as the better-known figures of judge and mufti. Taking directions from the rulers, the sultan foremost among them, they were also guided by legal doctrine as formulated by the jurists, combining these two sources of law in one face of authority. The daily workings of the law are illuminated by the reports of the muhtasib in the vivid Mamluk-era chronicles, which often also captured the responses of the individuals who encountered the official. The book is organized around actions taken by the muhtasib in the areas of Muslim devotional and pious practices; crimes and offenses; the management of Christians and Jews; market regulation and consumer protection; the specific markets for essential bread; currency and taxes; and public order. The case studies presented show that while legal doctrine was clearly relevant to the muhtasib’s actions, the policy demands of the sultan were also quite significant, and rules from both sources of authority intersected with social, political, economic, and personal factors to create full and vibrant scenarios that reveal the practice of Islamic law.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602438.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stilt, K.
Corresponding author
Stilt, Kristen
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2012-01-12
OpenAlex
W265752391
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.08
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval and Early Modern Justice
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Ottoman Empire History and Society
Keywords
Islamic law, muhtasib, Mamluk Egypt, Fustat, Cairo, market regulation, public order, religious authority, legal doctrine, religious devotion, consumer protection, bread market, Mamluk chronicles, legal officials, everyday law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review