The DOI matches its Crossref record.
6 Imperial Frameworks
Abstract
Failure in America raised questions about the value of colonies and the future of the British empire. British governments, however, considered that certain colonial possessions remained of fundamental importance and that they should continue to be managed on established principles. The prominence given to Ireland and the West Indies together with the remaining North American colonies meant that the Atlantic remained the main sphere of British concerns, although the East India Company's Indian territories was becoming a major imperial commitment which was gaining in consequence. The chapter stresses continuities rather than changes which might be seen as marking any immediate shift towards the creation of second empire different from that before the loss of America. A concluding section notes the beginnings of a new American continental empire purporting to be very different from the British one.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- W. S. Sorsby, ‘The British Superintendency of the Mosquito Shore, 1749–1787’, University of London PhD thesis, 1960.
- Carole W. Troxler, ‘The Migration of Carolina and Georgia Loyalists to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick’, University of North Carolina PhD thesis, 1974.
- James Vance, ‘Constitutional Radicalism in Scotland and Ireland in the Era of the American Revolution, c.1760–1784’, University of Aberdeen PhD thesis, 1998.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jamaican Legislation and the Transatlantic Constitution, 1664–1839
GRAHAM, A. (2018) · The Historical Journal · doi:10.1017/s0018246x1700022x · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, P. J.
- Corresponding author
- Marshall, Peter J.
- ORCID
- Marshall, Peter J.
- Venue
- Remaking the British Atlantic
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2012-03-22
- Pages
- 118-135
- OpenAlex
- W4231507320
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Australian History and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Influence
- Keywords
- British Empire, American Revolution, colonial policy, West Indies, North American colonies, East India Company, Atlantic world
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review