The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Mass Observers: A History, 1937-1949
Abstract
This is the first full scale history of Mass-Observation, the independent social research organization which, between 1937 and 1949, set out to document the attitudes, opinions, and everyday lives of the British people. Through a combination of anthropological fieldwork, opinion surveys, and written testimony solicited from hundreds of volunteers, Mass-Observation created a huge archive of popular life during a tumultuous decade which remains central to British national identity. The social history of these years has been immeasurably enriched by the archive, and extracts from the writings of Mass-Observation's volunteers have won a wide and admiring audience. But the history of the organization itself—the staff, the research methods, the struggle for funding, Mass-Observation's characteristic 'voice', and its role in the cultural and political life of the period—are themselves as interesting as any of the themes that the founders set out to document. This history does justice not only to Tom Harrisson and Charles Madge, the two founders, whose tempestuous relationship dominated the early years of Mass-Observation, but also to the dozens of creative, imaginative, and, until now largely unknown, young enthusiasts whose work helped to keep the show on the road. It also corrects and revises much of our existing knowledge of Mass-Observation, opening up new and important perspectives on the organization and its wider significance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other files come from the archives of Mass-Observation, a social research organisation which was commissioned by the Ministry of Information between 1939 and 1941 to provide information on civilian morale and, most pertinently, on the public's reception of the Ministry's propaganda (Highmore, 2002; Hinton, 2013).”
From The Ministry of Information and the linguistic design of Britain’s World War II propaganda: What archival documents can tell us about political discourse (2020) · cites this paper as Hinton, 2013
Citations
Cited by
Spencer-Bennett, J. (2020) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926519889125 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinton, J.
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-03-21
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.