Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 67

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Mass Observers: A History, 1937-1949

Hinton, James·2013

Abstract

This is the first full scale history of Mass-Observation, the independent social research organization which, between 1937 and 1949, set out to document the attitudes, opinions, and everyday lives of the British people. Through a combination of anthropological fieldwork, opinion surveys, and written testimony solicited from hundreds of volunteers, Mass-Observation created a huge archive of popular life during a tumultuous decade which remains central to British national identity. The social history of these years has been immeasurably enriched by the archive, and extracts from the writings of Mass-Observation's volunteers have won a wide and admiring audience. But the history of the organization itself—the staff, the research methods, the struggle for funding, Mass-Observation's characteristic 'voice', and its role in the cultural and political life of the period—are themselves as interesting as any of the themes that the founders set out to document. This history does justice not only to Tom Harrisson and Charles Madge, the two founders, whose tempestuous relationship dominated the early years of Mass-Observation, but also to the dozens of creative, imaginative, and, until now largely unknown, young enthusiasts whose work helped to keep the show on the road. It also corrects and revises much of our existing knowledge of Mass-Observation, opening up new and important perspectives on the organization and its wider significance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671045.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Hinton, J.
Published
2013-03-21
Cited by
67
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.