The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Goal Consensus and Collaboration
Abstract
This chapter examines via meta-analyses results of recent studies, published from 2000 through 2009, that relate goal consensus and collaboration to treatment outcome. Specifically, fifteen studies with a total sample size of 1,302 yielded a goal consensus–psychotherapy outcome effect size of .34 (SD = .19), indicating that better outcomes can be expected when patient and therapist agree on therapeutic goals and the processes to achieve these goals. The collaboration–outcome meta-analysis based on 19 studies with a total sample of 2,260 patients yielded a mean correlation of .33 (SD = .17), suggesting that psychotherapy outcome appears to be considerably enhanced when patient and therapist are actively involved in a cooperative relationship. We discuss therapeutic practices that follow from these findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As shown in Figure 1, the effect for goal consensus and collaboration is strong (d50.72),based on a meta-analysis of 15 studies (43).”
From How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update (2015) · cites this paper as [43]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update
Wampold, B. E. (2015) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20238 · Cited by 1,728
Wampold, B. E., & Budge, S. L. (2012) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000011432709 · Cited by 157
Prytz, M., Harkestad, K. N., Veseth, M., & Bjornestad, J. (2019) · Annals of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12991-019-0234-6 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Tryon, G. S., & Winograd, G.
- ORCID
- Winograd, Greta
- Venue
- Psychotherapy Relationships That Work
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Pages
- 153-167
- OpenAlex
- W4232617982
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- goal consensus, therapeutic collaboration, psychotherapy outcome, patient-therapist agreement, treatment outcomes, therapeutic relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
