The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Power from Powerlessness
Abstract
As American Indian tribes seek to overcome centuries of political and social marginalization, they face daunting obstacles. The successes of some tribal casinos have lured many outside observers into thinking that gambling revenue alone can somehow mend the devastation of culture, community, natural resources, and sacred spaces. The reality is quite different. Tribal officials often plan and execute their strategies amidst dilapidated offices, meager budgets, and populations that struggle against the ravages of shockingly low incomes. Yet we find examples of Indian tribes persuading states, localities, and the federal government to pursue policy change that addresses important tribal concerns. How is it that Indian tribes sometimes succeed against very dim odds? To answer this question, this book brings together ideas about the politics of the powerless and about political institutions. The book illustrates how political underdogs can build particular types of external relationships—that is termed in this book institutional niches—to provide small but needed subsidies for cultivating expertise, which then provide unobtrusive foundations for future political victories. Disadvantaged groups do not suddenly begin winning high-profile battles. Instead, the effects are indirect, of low visibility, and far flung throughout the federalist system. In isolation, each new quiet success seems unremarkable; cumulatively, the effects are impressive.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies document how tribal governments use increasingly diverse and sophisticated strategies to influence state and local politics.
“Recent studies document how tribal governments use increasingly diverse and sophisticated strategies to influence state and local politics (Boehmke and Witmer 2015;Evans 2011;Hansen and Skopek 2011;Holyoake 2009;Johnson and Witmer 2020).”
From Dividing Authority Three Ways: Federal–Tribal–State Relations after Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2023) · cites this paper as Evans 2011
Tribal governments have developed expertise in engaging with the federal government.
“Tribal governments have developed expertise in engaging with the federal government (Carlson 2018;Evans 2011).”
From Dividing Authority Three Ways: Federal–Tribal–State Relations after Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2023) · cites this paper as Evans 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dividing Authority Three Ways: Federal–Tribal–State Relations after Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta
Carlson, K. M. (2023) · Publius: The Journal of Federalism · doi:10.1093/publius/pjad020 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, L.
- Corresponding author
- Evans, Laura
- ORCID
- Evans, Laura
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-03-23
- OpenAlex
- W2477388826
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
- Keywords
- Native American tribes, tribal casinos, gambling revenue, political institutions, federalism, policy change, marginalization, federal Indian policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review