A Theory of Fields
Abstract
Finding ways to understand the nature of social change and social order—from political movements to market meltdowns—is one of the enduring problems of social science. This book draws together far-ranging insights from social movement theory, organizational theory, and economic and political sociology to construct a general theory of social organization and strategic action. This book proposes that social change and social order can be understood through what the book calls strategic action fields. It posits that these fields are the general building blocks of political and economic life, civil society, and the state, and the fundamental form of order in our world today. Similar to Russian dolls, they are nested and connected in a broader environment of almost countless proximate and overlapping fields. Fields are mutually dependent; change in one often triggers change in another. At the core of the theory is an account of how social actors fashion and maintain order in a given field. This sociological theory of action, what they call “social skill,” helps explain what individuals do in strategic action fields to gain cooperation or engage in competition. To demonstrate the breadth of the theory, the book makes its abstract principles concrete through extended case studies of the Civil Rights Movement and the rise and fall of the market for mortgages in the U.S. since the 1960s. The book also provides a “how-to” guide to help others implement the approach and discusses method…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Identification of the context-specific interactions that constitute revolutionary processes generates a dual benefit: intimate knowledge of concrete revolutionary episodes and understanding of how revolutions are sedimented within wider fields of action.
“However, identification of the context-specific interactions that constitute revolutionary processes generates a dual benefit: intimate knowledge of concrete revolutionary episodes and understanding of how revolutions are sedimented within wider fields of action (Flyvbjerg 2001; Fligstein and McAdam 2012).”
From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Fligstein and McAdam 2012
Social action is embedded within fields of action that constrain behavior and give meaning to these actions.
“social action is embedded within fields of action that constrain behavior and give meaning to these actions (Flyvbjerg 2001; Fligstein and McAdam 2012).”
From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Fligstein and McAdam 2012
There is no non-structured action that is free from broader ties, connections, patterns, and interrelations.
“There is no non-structured action that is free from broader ties, connections, patterns, and interrelations (Emirbayer and Goodwin 1996: 364; Fligstein and McAdam 2012: 48-9).”
From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Fligstein and McAdam 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conceptualizing Historical Organization Studies
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0133 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Schoon, E. W. (2022) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224221081379 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory
Lawson, G. (2016) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275116649221 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Chaves-Avila, R., & Gallego-Bono, J. R. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104059 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
When does brokerage matter? Citation impact of research teams in an emerging academic field
Collet, F., Robertson, D. A., & Lup, D. (2014) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127014530124 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D.
- ORCID
- Fligstein, Neil
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-07-01
- OpenAlex
- W4245671161
- Cited by
- 1,857
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 130 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 207 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 188 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 162 · 2015: 109 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 76.28
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Keywords
- strategic action fields, social change, social order, social skills, social organization, social movement theory, organizational theory, political sociology, economic sociology, civil society, state, competition and cooperation, civil rights movement, mortgage market, political movements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review