The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Josephus and the Theologies of Ancient Judaism
Abstract
This book reexamines the theological positions attributed to the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes, by the ancient Jewish historian Flavius Josephus. The analysis attends to Josephus's overall literary concerns, while carefully comparing Josephus's accounts with relevant biblical, rabbinic, and Dead Sea texts. The book argues that Josephus provides a relatively accurate picture of Jewish theological diversity in his day. This book also examines Josephus's own theologizing. It argues that Josephus articulated a largely Pharisaic theology, in line with his claim to have adopted this group's ways. This book also establishes that Josephus's own theology points in many of the directions that later, rabbinic Judaism was to follow in its reaction to the destruction of the second temple. Without denying the importance of Jewish law—and recognizing Josephus's embellishments and exaggerations—this project calls for a renewed focus on Josephus's testimony, and models an approach to ancient Judaism that gives theological questions a deserved place alongside matters of legal concern. Ancient Jewish theology was indeed diverse. Jewish theologizing was also sufficiently robust to be able to offer answers to the historical challenges faced by Jews at that time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, nomos can also be used in ways more similar to the modern idea of custom over law (War 1.145-147; Ant.14. 61-63; War 2.390-394; c.f. Klawans 2012, p. 157) or to the concept of teaching (Redditt 1983).”
From Paul Within Ioudaismos: The Shifting Focus of Paul’s Zeal in Galatians (2025) · cites this paper as Klawans 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paul Within Ioudaismos: The Shifting Focus of Paul’s Zeal in Galatians
Lavender, J. (2025) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel16091161 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Klawans, J.
- Corresponding author
- Klawans, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Klawans, Jonathan
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-10-12
- OpenAlex
- W658498399
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Josephus, Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Second Temple Judaism, rabbinic Judaism, Dead Sea Scrolls, Jewish law, destruction of the Second Temple
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review