Cited by 495Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Developmental Influences on Adult Intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study

Schaie, K. Warner·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Adult cognitive development is one of the most important yet most neglected aspects in the study of human psychology. Although the development of cognition and intelligence during childhood and adolescence is of great interest to researchers, educators, and parents, many assume that this development stops progressing in any significant manner when people reach adulthood. In fact, cognition and intelligence do continue to progress in very significant ways. This book presents the history, latest data, and results from the Seattle Longitudinal Study (SLS). The purpose of the SLS is to study various aspects of psychological development during the adult years. Initiated in 1956 and focusing on a random sample of 500 adults ranging in age from 25 to 95 years old, the SLS is organized around five questions: Does intelligence change uniformly throughout adulthood, or are there different life-course-ability patterns? At what age and at what magnitude can decrement in ability be reliably detected? What are the patterns and magnitude of generational differences? What accounts for individual differences in age-related change in adulthood? Can the intellectual decline that increases with age be reversed by educational intervention? Virtually all of the content from the first edition has been updated and expanded, and three new chapters are included on health behaviors and intellectual functioning, biological influences on cognitive change, and prediction of individual cognitive decline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195386134.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cross-sectional design compares adults from different age cohorts, and any observed differences might be contaminated by cohort differences owing to societal or generational changes or events.

    “an immediate limitation is that the design compares adults from different age cohorts, and any observed differences might be contaminated by cohort difference owing to societal or generational changes or events (e.g., war, pandemics, medical advancements, Schaie 2012).”

    From Cognitive Aging Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WAIS-5 (2025) · cites this paper as Schaie 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaie, K. W.
Corresponding author
Schaie, K. Warner
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2012-12-06
OpenAlex
W4300482063
Cited by
495
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
24.83
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
adult cognitive development, adult intelligence, Seattle Longitudinal Study, age-related cognitive decline, generational differences, cognitive decline prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review