Developmental Influences on Adult Intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study
Abstract
Adult cognitive development is one of the most important yet most neglected aspects in the study of human psychology. Although the development of cognition and intelligence during childhood and adolescence is of great interest to researchers, educators, and parents, many assume that this development stops progressing in any significant manner when people reach adulthood. In fact, cognition and intelligence do continue to progress in very significant ways. This book presents the history, latest data, and results from the Seattle Longitudinal Study (SLS). The purpose of the SLS is to study various aspects of psychological development during the adult years. Initiated in 1956 and focusing on a random sample of 500 adults ranging in age from 25 to 95 years old, the SLS is organized around five questions: Does intelligence change uniformly throughout adulthood, or are there different life-course-ability patterns? At what age and at what magnitude can decrement in ability be reliably detected? What are the patterns and magnitude of generational differences? What accounts for individual differences in age-related change in adulthood? Can the intellectual decline that increases with age be reversed by educational intervention? Virtually all of the content from the first edition has been updated and expanded, and three new chapters are included on health behaviors and intellectual functioning, biological influences on cognitive change, and prediction of individual cognitive decline.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cross-sectional design compares adults from different age cohorts, and any observed differences might be contaminated by cohort differences owing to societal or generational changes or events.
“an immediate limitation is that the design compares adults from different age cohorts, and any observed differences might be contaminated by cohort difference owing to societal or generational changes or events (e.g., war, pandemics, medical advancements, Schaie 2012).”
From Cognitive Aging Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WAIS-5 (2025) · cites this paper as Schaie 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive Aging Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WAIS-5
Winter, E. L., Dale, B. A., Maharjan, S., Lando, C. R., Larsen, C. M., Courville, T., & Kaufman, A. S. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13070085 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schaie, K. W.
- Corresponding author
- Schaie, K. Warner
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-12-06
- OpenAlex
- W4300482063
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 24.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- adult cognitive development, adult intelligence, Seattle Longitudinal Study, age-related cognitive decline, generational differences, cognitive decline prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review