The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation
Abstract
All over the world, democratic reforms have brought power to the people, but under conditions where the people have little opportunity to think about the power that they exercise. This book combines a new theory of democracy with actual practice and shows how an idea that harks back to ancient Athens can be used to revive our modern democracies. This book outlines deliberative democracy projects conducted by the author with various collaborators in the US, China, Britain, Denmark, Australia, Italy, Bulgaria, Northern Ireland, and in the entire European Union. These projects have resulted in the massive expansion of wind power in Texas, the building of sewage treatment plants in China, and greater mutual understanding between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This challenge in turn leads to risks of uneven voter turnout, the influence of special interests, and great inconsistencies in the results of referenda (Fishkin 2011).”
From The Ethics of Alternative Currencies (2022) · cites this paper as Fishkin 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · Cited by 1,863
The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?
Minozzi, W., Song, H., Lazer, D. M. J., Neblo, M. A., & Ognyanova, K. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12469 · Cited by 123
The Ethics of Alternative Currencies
Larue, L., Meyer, C., Hudon, M., & Sandberg, J. (2022) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2021.52 · Cited by 23
Crawford, J. T., & Ruscio, J. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620972367 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Fishkin, J. S.
- Corresponding author
- Fishkin, James S.
- ORCID
- Fishkin, James S.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-08-18
- OpenAlex
- W4255547221
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- deliberative democracy, democratic reform, citizen participation, Athenian democracy, public deliberation, wind power expansion, wastewater treatment plants, Protestant-Catholic reconciliation, Northern Ireland, European Union
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review