The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Emergent Past: A Relational Realist Archaeology of Early Bronze Age Mortuary Practices
Abstract
This book approaches archaeological research as an engagement within an assemblage - a particular configuration of materials, things, places, humans, animals, plants, techniques, technologies, forces, and ideas. Fowler develops a new interpretative method for that engagement, exploring how archaeological research can, and does, reconfigure each assemblage. Recognising the successive relationships that give rise to and reshaped assemblages over time, he proposes a relational realist understanding of archaeological evidence based on a reading of relational and non-representational theories, such as those presented by Karen Barad, Tim Ingold, and Bruno Latour. The volume explores this new approach through the first ever synthesis of Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age mortuary practices in Northeast England (c.2500-1500 BC), taking into account how different concepts and practices have changed the assemblage of Early Bronze Age mortuary practices in the past 200 years
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This in turn has theoretical implications with respect to our ability to delineate and map not only a richer and more nuanced set of relational capacities, but through these begin to develop methodologies for realising the potential of powerful new frameworks and heuristics such as assemblages and affective fields (e.g.Fowler 2013, 20-58;Harris and Sørensen 2010).”
From Mapping invisibility: GIS approaches to the analysis of hiding and seclusion (2015) · cites this paper as Fowler 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping invisibility: GIS approaches to the analysis of hiding and seclusion
Gillings, M. (2015) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.06.015 · Cited by 71
Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility
Gillings, M. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.004 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowler, C.
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-10-24
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
