Cited by 3Anthropological Studies and InsightsCross-Cultural and Social AnalysisCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

The Nature of Culture

Cruz, M. Dores·2014·Rethinking Colonial Pasts through Archaeology

Abstract

This chapter examines the role of landscapes and natural elements as historic and memory markers, focusing on sacred trees and tree groves as part of the archaeology of the Mandlakazi region in Southern Mozambique. More specifically, it explores how trees and tree groves relate to ancestral figures that held political power and how they are an integral part of local history, and how this connection legitimises identity creation. It also considers how intangible elements such as rituals, community history, and webs of kinship relations are at once embedded and made visible through the use of landscapes and elements of nature in their construction of a collective social memory that encompasses the community of the living and of the ancestors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199696697.003.0006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cruz, M. D.
Corresponding author
Cruz, M. Dores
Venue
Rethinking Colonial Pasts through Archaeology
Published
2014-11-27
Pages
123-149
OpenAlex
W2890791569
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
nature of culture, cultural evolution, cultural transmission, human evolution, cultural universals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nature of Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199696697.003.0006
The paper
Cruz, M. D. (2014). The Nature of Culture. Rethinking Colonial Pasts through Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aosobl/9780199696697.003.0006