The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imperial Anxiety and the Dissolution of Colonial Space and Practice at Fort Moore, South Carolina
Abstract
This chapter examines the tensions of colonial power and their unintended consequences, with particular reference to the Yamasee War of 1715 and the construction of Fort Moore in South Carolina. More precisely, it juxtaposes two dimensions of English colonialism in the late 1600s and 1700s: first is the discourse concerning the place of Native Americans during England's sixteenth- and seventeenth-century imperial expansion into Southeastern North America; second is the lived reality among colonials and Native Americans at Fort Moore. The chapter highlights the contradictions between imperial prescriptions and everyday practices, especially in relation to the spatial management of people to offset fears of racial and cultural contamination between coloniser and Native living along the morally dangerous frontier.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Archaeology of Settler Colonialism in North America
Montgomery, L. M. (2022) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-123953 · Cited by 14
Legg, J. B., Blanton, D. B., Cobb, C. R., Smith, S. D., Lieb, B. R., & Boudreaux, E. A. (2018) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-018-0458-1 · Cited by 11
Self-citation« L’Exclusif » in Theory and Practice: French Guiana and the Eighteenth Century Atlantic Economy
Losier, C. (2020) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-020-00580-6 · Cited by 4
Flat Ontologies, Cosmopolitanism, and Space at Carolina Forts
Cobb, C. R. (2019) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s41636-019-00160-4 · Cited by 3
Self-citationTveskov, M. A., & Rose, C. (2019) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s41636-019-00159-x · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Cobb, C. R., & Sapp, S.
- ORCID
- Cobb, Charles R.
- Venue
- Rethinking Colonial Pasts through Archaeology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-11-27
- Pages
- 212-231
- OpenAlex
- W2500577077
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- English colonialism, colonial space, Native Americans, colonial frontier, imperial anxiety, colonial power, spatial management, South Carolina, colonial South Carolina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
