The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Duoethnography
Abstract
Duoethnography is a collaborative research methodology in which two or more researchers engage in a dialogue on their disparate histories in a given phenomenon. Their goal is to interrogate and re-conceptualize existing beliefs through a conversation that is written in a play-script format. The methodology of duoethnography serves as the focus of this book. Duoethnography facilitates stratified, nested, auto-ethnographic accounts of a given research context or question, designed to emphasize the complex, reflexive, and aesthetic aspects of both the work in process and the product. As a curriculum and a research method, duoethnography explores two seminal issues: representation in qualitative research (how to represent findings when findings are created within a dynamic phenomenonological text), and praxis (how research contributes to a sense of personal change). Duoethnography allows researchers to explore their hybrid identities and to see how their lives have been situated socially and culturally. Recent duoethnographic studies have examined a range of topics, including forms of institutionalized racism, beauty, post-colonialism, multicultural identity construction, and professional boundaries between patient and practitioner in mental health professions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Emerging issues in duoethnography
Breault, R. A. (2016) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1162866 · Cited by 197
Howell, N., Desjardins, A., & Fox, S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3462447 · Cited by 110
Feminist Care in the Anthropocene: Packing and Unpacking Tensions in Posthumanist HCI
Key, C., Gatehouse, C., & Taylor, N. (2022) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3532106.3533540 · Cited by 82
Vougioukalou, S. A., Dow, R., Bradshaw, L., & Pallant, T. (2019) · Contemporary Music Review · doi:10.1080/07494467.2019.1684075 · Cited by 84
Proceed with Care: Reimagining Home IoT Through a Care Perspective
Key, C., Browne, F., Taylor, N., & Rogers, J. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445602 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawyer, R. D., & Norris, J.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-11-29
- OpenAlex
- W4205809336
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- duoethnography, collaborative research methodology, researcher identity, autoethnography, praxis, personal transformation, institutional racism, beauty, postcolonialism, multicultural identity, mental health professions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
